[Bug tree-optimization/16876] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE on testcase with -O3 in fold-const

--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-18 09:26 --- A backport of the patch bootstraps & regtests ok on the 4.1 branch, but I'm unsure we want the side-effects of the rejects-valid, because this is valid code according to jsm (only undefined at runtime). -- rgue

Bug#393897: gcc-4.2: cross-compiler FTBFS

Version: 4.2-20061003-1 Severity: important Package: gcc-4.2 Tags: patch Hello, Due to nonexistence of file patches/cross-fixes.dpatch, gcc-4.2 fails to build the crosscompiler. (Message is ... no rule to make target stamp-xxx-cross-fixes) Please, add the file to make it work. Reagrds

Bug#393903: java-gcj-compat: overwrite files from libgcj-common

Package: java-gcj-compat Version: 1.0.65-7 Severity: serious Hello, > Automatic build of db4.5_4.5.20-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 98 > Build started at 20061018-0941 > ** ... > Unpacking java-gcj-compat (from

Processing of java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-8_i386.changes

java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-8.dsc java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-8.diff.gz java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-8_i386.deb java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-8_i386.deb java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-8_i386.deb Greetings,

Bug#393903: marked as done (java-gcj-compat: overwrite files from libgcj-common)

iately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: java-gcj-compat Version: 1.0.65-7 Severity: serious Hello, > Automatic build of db4.5_4.5.20-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 98 > Build started at 2

java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-8_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-8_i386.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-8_i386.deb java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-8_i386.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-8_i386.deb java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-8.diff.gz to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compa

[Bug other/28322] GCC new warnings and compatibility

-- ian at davenant dot greenend dot org dot uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at davenant dot greenend |

[Bug other/28322] GCC new warnings and compatibility

--- Comment #2 from ian at davenant dot greenend dot org dot uk 2006-10-18 15:11 --- > Again this is a policy issue rather than really a bug, I am > thinking about closing this as invalid as I thought our policy is clear. I'm afraid I don't understand. What policy are you referring to

[Bug other/28322] GCC new warnings and compatibility

-- pmaydell at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pmaydell at chiark dot |

Processed: fsf-funding.7: it's back!

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found #385732 1.47 Bug#385732: gcc-defaults: Non-free files in source package Bug marked as found in version 1.47. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, D

Bug#385732: fsf-funding.7: it's back!

found #385732 1.47 thanks In version 1.47, fsf-funding.7 is in the source tarball again. Reopening the bug, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384809: How about closing this bug?

Shouldn't this bug be closed, now that gcc-4.1-doc is available in non-free and gcc-doc has moved to contrib? Kind regards, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug libstdc++/16006] Conversions of numbers in fi_FI.UTF-8 produces incorrect UTF-8

-- bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bkoz at redhat dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1600

Processing of java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-8_m68k.changes

java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-8_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-8_m68k.deb java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-8_m68k.deb java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-8_m68k.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P

Processing of gcc-defaults_1.48_i386.changes

gcc-defaults_1.48_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-defaults_1.48.dsc gcc-defaults_1.48.tar.gz cpp_4.1.1-13_i386.deb gcc_4.1.1-13_i386.deb gnat_4.1.1-13_i386.deb g++_4.1.1-13_i386.deb gobjc_4.1.1-13_i386.deb gobjc++_4.1.1-13_i386.deb g77_3.4

java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-8_m68k.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-8_m68k.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-8_m68k.deb java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-8_m68k.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-8_m68k.deb java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-8_m68k.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-comp

Bug#384809: marked as done (gcc-doc depends on non-existent package)

Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:24:11 +0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Processed: reopen libstdc++ report, tagged as enhancement by upstream

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 351786 Bug#351786: [PR29379] bad thousand separator with UTF-8 locales Bug reopened, originator not changed. > severity 351786 wishlist Bug#351786: [PR29379] bad thousand separator with UTF-8 locales Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' > t

[Bug tree-optimization/16876] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE on testcase with -O3 in fold-const

--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-18 18:56 --- (In reply to comment #17) > A backport of the patch bootstraps & regtests ok on the 4.1 branch. Except it introduces PR 29478. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report f

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.0

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #356316 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR7302 # * remote status changed: NEW -> ASSIGNED usertags 356316 - status-NE

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #377613 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26881 # * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED # * remote resolutio

gcc-defaults override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): gpc-doc_3.4.6-17_i386.deb: package says section is doc, override says devel. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wro

gcc-defaults_1.48_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp_4.1.1-13_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.1.1-13_i386.deb g++_4.1.1-13_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_4.1.1-13_i386.deb g77_3.4.6-17_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g77_3.4.6-17_i386.deb gcc-defaults_1.48.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc-defaults_1

Bug#385732: marked as done (gcc-defaults: Non-free files in source package)

Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:48:53 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#385732: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.48 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Results for 4.2.0 20061015 (experimental) testsuite on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Sun Oct 15 09:03:58 UTC 2006 (revision 117742) === acats tests === FAIL: c35507m FAIL: c99005a FAIL: cd2a23e FAIL: cxh1001 === acats Summary === # of expected passes2311 # of unexpected failures4 Native configuration is ia6

Bug#394034: gcc-4.1 has a typo when looking for 64 bit libraries on s390.

Package: gcc-4.1Version: 4.1.1-16gcc-4.1 has a typo when looking for 64 bit libraries on s390.I names path as ../s390-linux/lib64 but it is ../s390-linux-gnu/lib64Patch available I am using Debian GNU/Linux 2.4.1, kernel 2.6.18-1-xen-vserver-amd64 and libc6 2.3.6.ds1-6 s390-typo.patch Descripti

Bug#394034: gcc-4.1 has a typo when looking for 64 bit libraries on s390.

Hector Oron writes: > Package: gcc-4.1 > Version: 4.1.1-16 > > gcc-4.1 has a typo when looking for 64 bit libraries on s390. > > I names path as ../s390-linux/lib64 but it is ../s390-linux-gnu/lib64 hmm, care to elaborate? > Patch available please send it. thanks, Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIB