Processed: Re: Bug#392880: gcc-4.1: off-by-one error for string initialiser warnings

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 392880 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29468 Bug#392880: gcc-4.1: off-by-one error for string initialiser warnings Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29468. > tags 392880 + upstream Bug#392880: gcc-4.1: off-by-one e

Bug#392880: gcc-4.1: off-by-one error for string initialiser warnings

Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > one very useful feature of gcc is, that it warns you when you > produce unterminated strings by using too long initialisers. > Unfortunately the warning only kicks in, if the initialiser is at > least two bytes longer than the string buffer. This is delib

Bug#392974: gcc-4.1: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] package contains non-free documentation

Package: gcc-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-16 Severity: serious The package (at least the source) contains GFDL docs with invariant sections and/or cover texts. [bode:/tmp]$ apt-get source gcc-4.1 Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances... Fait Nécessité de prendre 44,0

Bug#392974: gcc-4.1: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] package contains non-free documentation

Aurelien Jarno writes: > The package (at least the source) contains GFDL docs with invariant > sections and/or cover texts. please don't file reports for issues that you didn't investigate. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR

Bug#392880: gcc-4.1: off-by-one error for string initialiser warnings

Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > char string3[2] = "12"; > char d[]="d"; > char string4[2] = "123"; > char e[]="e"; > Here 'string3' and 'string4' are unterminated, as can be seen from the > program output at the end. But only the initialiser for 'string4' > gives a warn

Bug#392880: marked as done ([PR29468] off-by-one error for string initialiser warnings)

Your message dated Sat, 14 Oct 2006 15:13:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#392880: gcc-4.1: off-by-one error for string initialiser warnings has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

[Bug c/29468] off-by-one error for string initialiser warning

--- Comment #1 from neil at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 12:25 --- Not a bug - just 2 elements are initialized, the NUL is dropped. -- neil at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

Processed: gcc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 392172 -1 Bug#392172: FTBFS: JTree.h:118: error: parse error in template argument list Bug 392172 cloned as bug 393010. > reassign -1 gcc-4.1 Bug#393010: FTBFS: JTree.h:118: error: parse error in template argument list Bug reassigned from package

Processed: still there

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 393010 Bug#393010: rejects templates in destructors Bug reopened, originator not changed. > found 393010 4.1.1ds1-16 Bug#393010: rejects templates in destructors Bug marked as found in version 4.1.1ds1-16. > -- Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#380541: gcc: Wrong code for hoisted multiplication

tags 380541 + patch thanks Andrew Pinski (pinskia) posted a patch on the upstream bugzilla: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28545#c14 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12428&action=view and we believe it's applicable to the Debian package: 17:19 < Womble2> pinskia: Don't

Processed: Re: gcc: Wrong code for hoisted multiplication

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 380541 + patch Bug#380541: gcc: Wrong code for hoisted multiplication There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

[Bug java/1427] gcj should generate N_MAIN stab or DW_AT_entry_point dwarf2 debug info

--- Comment #19 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 14:17 --- Someone should make gdb understand the DW_AT_calling_convention attribute. This is the bit necessary to make it work for Fortran. I considered stealing a bit on FUNCTION_DECL to mark it as the main program but it s

[Bug java/1427] gcc should allow gcj and gfortran to generate N_MAIN stab or DW_AT_entry_point dwarf2 debug info

-- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gcj should generate N_MAIN |gcc should allow gcj and |stab or DW_AT_entry_point

Bug#393071: segmentation fault, related to sizeof

Package: gcc-4.1 Version: 4.1.1ds1-16 This is a regression from 4.1.1ds1-13. This is PR29469 > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../lib -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 > -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 > -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/gtk-1.

Processed: Re: compiler

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 392559 gcc-4.1 Bug#392559: avifile: FTBFS: error: non-template 'pair' used as template Bug reassigned from package `avifile' to `gcc-4.1'. > forwarded 392559 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29469 Bug#392559: avifile: FTBFS: error: non-template 'pair' use

[Bug debug/26881] [4.1 Regression] internal compiler error in dwarf2out_finish

--- Comment #20 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-14 16:48 --- Jan, do you intend to apply this to 4.1? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26881 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -

Bug#392054: ginac: FTBFS on arm

Setting CXXFLAGS to -O instead of -O2 at least makde the package compile. (I don't suppose that g++-4.1_4.1.1-16 made a difference.) See -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsub

Bug#391445: GCC 4.1 BUG - Cross compiling

> Hello Nikita, > > I write you this mail, because, you did all the work to patch binutils > and gcc older versions. I have been trying to solve Debian bug 391445, > but i haven't been able to do it. Maybe you could tell me what would be > a good way to solve it, or maybe it is just a line in the

Bug#390879: [m68k] ICE in reload at reload1.c:1079

forwarded 390879 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29472 tags 390879 + forwarded thanks * Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-03 07:55]: > blender fails to build from source on m68k due to an ICE. Forwarded, thanks. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P

Bug#385327: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393

* Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-01 14:23]: > > > Please recheck with gcc-4.1.1-14 > > > > Isn't this PR28181 (still open)? Or did Roman not close PR tickets? > > This is still open as indicated by the failed builds of yacas and vtk. Yes, that's what I was trying to say, i.e. th

[Bug c++/29469] New: error: non-template 'pair' used as template

The following example code compiled fine with 4.1.2 20060901 (Debian 4.1.1-13) but fails with 4.1.2 20061007 (Debian 4.1.1-16). I'm wondering whether this change was intentional and whether there's a good reason for this change (in a stable branch). $ g++-4.1 -c pair.c x.c:32: error: non-template

[Bug c++/29469] error: non-template 'pair' used as template

--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-14 17:37 --- Created an attachment (id=12429) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12429&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29469 --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Bug c++/29469] error: non-template 'pair' used as template

--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 17:48 --- The real question is avm_map dependent inside the nested class? I know there are C++ defect reports asking that question so ... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29469 --- You are receiving thi

Bug#392974: gcc-4.1: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] package contains non-free documentation

On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:02:10PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Aurelien Jarno writes: > > The package (at least the source) contains GFDL docs with invariant > > sections and/or cover texts. > please don't file reports for issues that you didn't investigate. Does that mean the bug should be cl

Bug#392054: ginac: FTBFS on arm

* Richard B. Kreckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-14 22:14]: > Setting CXXFLAGS to -O instead of -O2 at least makde the package > compile. (I don't suppose that g++-4.1_4.1.1-16 made a difference.) This is not necesarily a compiler error. GCC might just be running out of memory or something. An

Bug#392974: gcc-4.1: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] package contains non-free documentation

* Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061014 07:02]: > Aurelien Jarno writes: > > The package (at least the source) contains GFDL docs with invariant > > sections and/or cover texts. > > please don't file reports for issues that you didn't investigate. Hm, Matthias, does that mean that you don't

Processed: fwded

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forward 393071 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29469 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > tags 393071 + upstream Bug#393071: segmentation fault, related to sizeof There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > -- Stopping processing here. Please

[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] error: non-template 'pair' used as template

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|error: non-template 'pair' |[DR 224] error: non-template |used as template

[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] error: non-template 'pair' used as template

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 18:11 --- (In reply to comment #2) > The real question is avm_map dependent inside the nested class? > I know there are C++ defect reports asking that question so ... And that is DR 224 which is in WP. -- http://gcc.gnu.o

[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] error: non-template 'pair' used as template

--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 18:15 --- I think this is more complicated than just DR 224. See PR 9634. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29469 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or a

[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] error: non-template 'pair' used as template

--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 18:25 --- DR 224 says this is invalid code but GDR has mentioned that DR 224 is broken in really bad way: template struct B : T { void g(void) { B x; x.f(); } } struct A { void f(void) {} } int main(void) { B t; t.

[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] error: non-template 'pair' used as template

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||9634 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29469 --- You

[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] error: non-template 'pair' used as template

--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-10-14 18:26 --- Subject: Re: [DR 224] error: non-template 'pair' used as template On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 18:25 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > --- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 1

Bug#392054: ginac: FTBFS on arm

* Richard B. Kreckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-14 22:14]: > Setting CXXFLAGS to -O instead of -O2 at least makde the package > compile. (I don't suppose that g++-4.1_4.1.1-16 made a difference.) It compiles fine on my ARM box with -O2, using 4.1.1-13+b1 and 4.1.1-16. I suspect a temporary pro

Processed: Re: Processed: fwded

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 393071 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29469 Bug#393071: segmentation fault, related to sizeof Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29469. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Deb

Bug#392974: marked as done (gcc-4.1: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] package contains non-free documentation)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Oct 2006 00:25:52 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#392974: gcc-4.1: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] package contains non-free documentation has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#391445: GCC 4.1 BUG - Cross compiling

On 10/15/06, Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 999_lib64_for_cross.dpatch is still available in #231707 logs. I've not yet tested if it applies to current binutils package, and if this will fix #391445, but I'm almost sure the problem is here. Yes, it helps, just tested with bin

Status of gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-16

Matthias Klose asked me to test gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-16 (4.1.2 20061007) to see whether it can be used instead of gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-13 (4.1.2 20060901) currently in testing. I found the following three regressions, two of which are issues where code is rejected that 4.1.1ds1-13 accepted: - PR c++/29

[Bug target/29472] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] in reload, at reload1.c:1081 on m68k with -O2 -fPIC

-- tbm at cyrius dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||debian-gcc at lists dot ||debian

[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] error: non-template 'pair' used as template

-- fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot |