java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-1_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-1_powerpc.deb java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-1_powerpc.deb java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/

java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-1_amd64.deb java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-1_amd64.deb java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj

Processing of java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-1_amd64.changes

java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-1_amd64.deb java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-1_amd64.deb java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA

Processing of java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-1_powerpc.changes

java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-1_powerpc.deb java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-1_powerpc.deb java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-1_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-1_hppa.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-1_hppa.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-1_hppa.deb java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-1_hppa.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-1_hppa.deb java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-1_hppa.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-comp

Processing of java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-1_hppa.changes

java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-1_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-1_hppa.deb java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-1_hppa.deb java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-1_hppa.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P

Bug#385732: gcc-defaults: Non-free files in source package

Matthias Klose wrote: The source package still contains the non-free files fsf-funding.7, ok. gfdl.7 and gpl.7, apparently for no good reason since they aren't installed. Please remove them. no, license texts can be included. there's no reason to remove them. But the GFDL is not the lic

Bug#383251: g++-4.1: FTBFS for RQuantLib on i386/testing

On 22 August 2006 at 07:29, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 19 August 2006 at 15:03, Matthias Klose wrote: | | Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: | | > | | > On 18 August 2006 at 00:58, Martin Michlmayr wrote: | | > | * John Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-17 13:46]: | | > | > Is there a way for me

Welcome to Al-Manahel Newsletter List

The subscription of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Thanks for subscribing! Date of this subscription: Sun Sep 3 06:38:25 2006 Please save this email message for future reference. -

Al-Manahel Newsletter List Unsubscription

The removal of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Date of this removal: Sun Sep 3 06:43:04 2006 Please save this email message for future reference. --

Bug#383251: g++-4.1: FTBFS for RQuantLib on i386/testing

* Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-03 06:47]: > I never heard any follow-up. Is there any? While it is nice that 4.1.1-11 is > now in testing it is not so nice that 4.1.1-11 exhibits the slow builds John > and I have been experiencing -- on different code bases, no less. I briefly l

Bug#383251: g++-4.1: FTBFS for RQuantLib on i386/testing

* Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-03 09:16]: > | up with some kind of (small) testcase. > > As John and I stated, 'small' is hard to define in the context of large-ish > C++ applications / libraries. The C++ source of RQuantLib are small (around > 60kb) and I could probably trim th

Bug#383251: g++-4.1: FTBFS for RQuantLib on i386/testing

On 3 September 2006 at 14:40, Martin Michlmayr wrote: | * Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-03 06:47]: | > I never heard any follow-up. Is there any? While it is nice that 4.1.1-11 is | > now in testing it is not so nice that 4.1.1-11 exhibits the slow builds John | > and I have bee

Bug#383251: g++-4.1: FTBFS for RQuantLib on i386/testing

On 3 September 2006 at 16:27, Martin Michlmayr wrote: | * Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-03 09:16]: | > | up with some kind of (small) testcase. | > | > As John and I stated, 'small' is hard to define in the context of large-ish | > C++ applications / libraries. The C++ source of

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report f

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.0

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report f

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status rep

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #356548 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26670 # * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED # * remote resolutio

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.0

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #307207 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19664 # * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED # * remote resolutio

[bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #382950 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24367 # * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED # * remote reso

Bug#383251: g++-4.1: FTBFS for RQuantLib on i386/testing

One interesting little illustration is provided by the CRAN timing summaries. The master site of CRAN (the CTAN / CPAN equivalent for R) is hosted on Debian testing. Compile/build/test times are shown at http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/checkTimings.html and RQuantLib is the 2nd most time

[Bug c++/27094] [4.0 Regression] tree check: expected tree_list, have omp_return in build_call

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2006-04-10 11:34:47 |2006-09-03 21:35:44 date||

Bug#341882: marked as done (gcc-4.0: [mips] support for tri-arch on mips & mipsel)

Your message dated Mon, 4 Sep 2006 02:50:12 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341882: binutils fix has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#341882: marked as done (gcc-4.0: [mips] support for tri-arch on mips & mipsel)

Sujet: Re: Bug#341882: binutils fix Expéditeur: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 02:50:12 +0200 Destinataire: Stuart Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Destinataire: Stuart Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tags 34188