Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#384927: Dangling slave link to c++.1.gz

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forcemerge 384927 384278 Bug#384927: Dangling slave link to c++.1.gz Bug#384278: gcc: postinst installs dangling symlink for manpage Mismatch - only Bugs in the same package can be forcibly merged: Bug 384278 is not in the same package as 384927 > force

[Bug c++/26670] attribute((packed)) sometimes not ignored for non-PODs

--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 08:31 --- Or perhaps we should ignore the __attribute__ ((packed)) on nonpod_pack, since one of its fields isn't safe to pack. Yes, that seems like the right way to handle this testcase. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show

[Bug c++/28370] [4.2 Regression] undefined reference to template class static variable in an anonymous namespace

--- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 12:29 --- Subject: Bug 28370 Author: jakub Date: Mon Aug 28 12:28:55 2006 New Revision: 116506 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116506 Log: PR c++/28370 * decl2.c (note_vague_linkage_var):

Bug#385010: GCC internal compiler error (seg-fault) whilst compiling wxWidgets

Package:  GCCVersion:   4.0.3When compiling wxWidgets-2.6.3 an internal compiler segfault occurs - prompting for a bug report to be submitted.  Compilation error occurs on AMD64 system (Ubuntu 6.06 Dapper Drake).Transcript:./bk-deps g++ -c -o basedll_stackwalk.o -I.pch/wxprec_basedll -D__WXGTK__   

[Bug target/28490] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in ia64_expand_move, at config/ia64/ia64.c:1088

--- Comment #16 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-08-28 16:07 --- Yes, I did some performance measurements with SPEC2000. Allowing any (symbol + offset) resulted in slightly slower code overall, allowing no (symbol + offset) resulted in slightly faster code overall. I will be submitti

Bug#384172: marked as done (g++-4.1: makes boost 1.33.1-5 FTBFS)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:55:32 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#384172: [pkg-boost-devel] Re: Bug#384172: g++-4.1: makes boost 1.33.1-5 FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#383185: marked as done (Minor typo in gcc man page)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:53:57 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#383185: Minor typo in gcc man page has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#385066: stlport5.1_5.0.99rc2-3_i386 FTBFS with g++-4.1 from unstable

Torsten Werner writes: > Package: g++-4.1 > Version: 4.1.1-11 > Severity: important > > Hello, > > > after upgrading g++-4.1 and libstdc++6-4.1-dev from version 4.1.1-5 to > version 4.1.1-11 the package stlport5.1 fails to build from source on > i386. I am attaching a full build log. The failing

Bug#357629: This patch needs changes

I've just tried building gcc-3.3 with this patch applied and it gets the Provides: lines wrong for libstdc++. Comparing it with the patch for gcc-3.4 (bug #357658) I changed the mentions of GCC_SO to CXX_SO in the obvious places, and it superficially seems to work. (I'd love to see a release

Results for 4.2.0 20060823 (experimental) testsuite on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Wed Aug 23 19:04:09 UTC 2006 (revision 116355) === acats tests === FAIL: c35507m FAIL: c37215h FAIL: cd2a23e FAIL: cxh1001 === acats Summary === # of expected passes2313 # of unexpected failures4 Native configuration is hpp

Al-Manahel Newsletter List Unsubscription

The removal of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Date of this removal: Mon Aug 28 19:33:24 2006 Please save this email message for future reference. --