package: gcc-4.1
version: 4.1.1-11
severity: normal
/etc/cron.daily/man-db:
mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/cc.1.gz is a dangling symlink
mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/c++.1.gz is a dangling symlink
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ man gcc
No manual entry for gcc
See 'man 7 undocumented' for help w
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:53:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:54:39PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > Any chance gcj >= 4.1.1-11j1 can make it into etch?
>
> gcj-4.1 hasn't been frozen yet, but whether this gets into etch depends on
> when it's uploaded.
I see.
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 11:42:03AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > Would be very nice to have gcjwebplugin-4.1. We'll have no browser java
> > > support
> > > otherwise.
> > Is gcjwebplugin in a presentable state yet?
> I'm not sure (at the time I wrote this, I hadn't tried it). So far I fou
severity 383713 normal
merge 383713 383755
thanks
* Thomas Schoepf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-19 10:48]:
> severity: normal
>
> /etc/cron.daily/man-db:
> mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/cc.1.gz is a dangling symlink
> mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/c++.1.gz is a dangling symlink
The c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 383713 normal
Bug#383713: gcc-4.1: Manpages are missing
Severity set to `normal' from `important'
> merge 383713 383755
Bug#383713: gcc-4.1: Manpages are missing
Bug#383755: gcc-4.1: no manual page for gcc
Merged 383713 383755.
> thanks
Stopp
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 02:59:28AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Last I knew, it still had
> > > serious security problems.
>
> > Which ones? I can't see anything in the BTS.
>
> I wouldn't know them by bug number; previously though, the problem was that
> gcjwebplugin didn't have appropria
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 02:59:28AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 11:42:03AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > Last I knew, it still had
> > > serious security problems.
>
> > Which ones? I can't see anything in the BTS.
>
> I wouldn't know them by bug number; previously
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:16:54PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>
> #267040: remote code execution hole due to lack of Java security manager
>
> This is 'fixed' by:
> - Shows warning before loading an applet (Closes: #267040, #301134)
Not a big deal, #383704 brought my browser down before
On 18 August 2006 at 00:58, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
| * John Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-17 13:46]:
| > Is there a way for me to instrument my code/system, etc to indicate
| > where the big time sink is?
|
| I'm not sure but I'll try to investigate.
I didn't make that as clear as I want
gcj-4.1 in experimental is not just about gcjwebplugin; it contains a
backport of a classpath-0.92 prerelease and gcj from the current
trunk. it's this upgrade which makes gcj interesting for etch. If we
do want to include, it has to be tested with packages currently
depending on it (packages like
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unmerge 383755
Bug#383755: gcc-4.1: no manual page for gcc
Bug#383713: gcc-4.1: Manpages are missing
Disconnected #383755 from all other report(s).
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
unmerge 383755
thanks
yes, but in this case we should not add the slave alternatives.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
>
> On 18 August 2006 at 00:58, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> | * John Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-17 13:46]:
> | > Is there a way for me to instrument my code/system, etc to indicate
> | > where the big time sink is?
> |
> | I'm not sure but I'll try to investigate
On Saturday 19 August 2006 07:03, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
> > On 18 August 2006 at 00:58, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > | * John Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-17 13:46]:
> > | > Is there a way for me to instrument my code/system, etc to indicate
> > | > where the big
I tried that again in 17 Aug (with gcc 4.1.2 20060715 )
in the typescript, I read
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -g -O0 -fprofile-arcs
-ftest-coverage -Wall -lm -o morph morph-main.o ../libmorph/libmorph.la -lm
mkdir .libs
gcc -g -O0 -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 02:39:15PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes:
> > On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 11:42:03AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > It's a little weird. The package that puts the plugin into firefox dir
> > > (via
> > > symlink) is java-gcj-compat-plugin, but gcjwebp
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20060721-1
Fails with -ftree-vectorize -O. PR27474
> Automatic build of ser_0.9.6-1 on usurper by sbuild/amd64 0.46
...
> gcc -g -O9 -funroll-loops -Wcast-align -Wall -minline-all-stringops
> -falign-loops -ftree-vectorize -mtune=opteron -DNAME='"ser"'
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 382153 libstdc++6-4.1-dev 4.1.1-11
Bug#382153: odyssey_0.4-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: compiler errors
Bug reassigned from package `odyssey' to `libstdc++6-4.1-dev'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
D
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Aug 14 22:35:40 UTC 2006 (revision 116137)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 3)
FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 4)
FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Aug 14 22:35:40 UTC 2006 (revision 116137)
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes1084
# of unsupported tests 8
=
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Aug 14 22:35:40 UTC 2006 (revision 116137)
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 3)
FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 4)
FAIL: g++.dg/look
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Aug 14 22:35:40 UTC 2006 (revision 116137)
Native configuration is mips-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 3)
FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 4)
FAIL: g++.dg/look
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Aug 14 22:35:40 UTC 2006 (revision 116137)
Native configuration is mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 3)
FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 4)
FAIL: g++.dg/lo
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Aug 14 22:35:40 UTC 2006 (revision 116137)
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 3)
FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 4)
FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 383848 + upstream
Bug#383848: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in
verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> forwarded 383848 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27474
Bug#383848: ICE: tree check: expec
Hi,b
Hope I am not writing to wrong address. I am naice, pretty blooking
girl. I am planning on visiting your town this month. aCan
bwe meet each other in person? Message me back at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Well, I forgot the attachments in the previous mail.
Here they are.
--
Love,
Marga
#include
#include
using namespace std;
int main (int argc, char *argv) {
string hi;
hi = "Hi";
return 0;
}
#include
using namespace std;
int main (int argc, char *argv) {
string hi;
hi = "Hi"
27 matches
Mail list logo
