Package: gcc-defaults
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Is it possible for gcc-defaults to not provide /usr/bin/gcc & co. but
using the alternatives ?
Personnally I want /usr/bin/gcc to point to /usr/bin/colorgcc and it's
remove each time I upgrade gcc.
Regards.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 193787 gcc-3.3-doc,cpp-3.3-doc
Bug#193787: [NONFREE-DOC] GCC documentation is non-free
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.3-doc,cpp-3.3-doc,g77-3.3-doc' to
`gcc-3.3-doc,cpp-3.3-doc'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
I have a new email address!You can now email me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]I Nalele Thambo, Manager of a bank in Africa I have a Business proposal if intrested get back to me- MR.NALELE THAMBO
tags 347697 - moreinfo
close 347697
thanks
gcc-4.1 in unstable (in a chroot) works with all -O options I discussed in the
report, so this problem seems fixed to me. I don't really need this fix in
4.0, so I am closing the bug.
--
Chris Howie
http://www.chrishowie.com
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
cpp-4.0_4.0.3-5_i386.deb: package says priority is standard, override says
optional.
cpp-4.0_4.0.3-5_powerpc.deb: package says priority is standard, override says
optional.
g++-4.0_4.0.3-
Accepted:
cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.3-5_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.3-5_all.deb
cpp-4.0_4.0.3-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.3-5_i386.deb
cpp-4.0_4.0.3-5_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.3-5_powerpc.deb
g++-4.0_4.0.3-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/g
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 347697 - moreinfo
Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags removed: moreinfo
> close 347697
Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed,
gcc-4.0_4.0.3-5_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libgfortran0-dev_4.0.3-5_i386.deb
lib64stdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.3-5_i386.deb
gfortran-4.0_4.0.3-5_i386.deb
libstdc++6-4.0-pic_4.0.3-5_i386.deb
libstdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.3-5_powerpc.deb
libgfortran0_4.0.3-5_po
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jul 2006 10:32:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367799: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An 'll /etc/udev/rules.d/025_libsane.rules' gives:
>
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 2006-07-06 09:54
> /etc/udev/rules.d/025_libsane.rules -> ../libsane.rules
>
> So this should be ok, but the permission problem remains. Is there
> any information I could p
--- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-16 20:17 ---
Subject: Bug 28370
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Jul 16 20:17:20 2006
New Revision: 115503
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115503
Log:
PR c++/28370
* decl2.c (note_vague_linkage_var):
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-16 22:24
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #378325
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28243
# * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags 378325 + status-NEW
t
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 8 23:37:37 UTC 2006 (revision 115291)
Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/omit-frame-pointer2.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/registers1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/noPLT.C
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 8 23:37:37 UTC 2006 (revision 115291)
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn1.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn2.c ex
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 8 23:37:37 UTC 2006 (revision 115291)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c96005d
FAIL: cc3120a
FAIL: la14002
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes1958
# of unexpected failures3
# of unsupported tests 356
Native
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 8 23:37:37 UTC 2006 (revision 115291)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2317
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Runnin
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: trunk revision 115451
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes12735
# of expected failures 67
# of unsupported tests
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: trunk revision 115451
Native configuration is mips-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/other/unused1.C scan-assembler stringz?\\t"class2"
FAIL: g++.dg/other/unused1.C scan-assembler stringz?\\t"printer"
FAIL: g++.
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: trunk revision 115451
Native configuration is mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/other/unused1.C scan-assembler stringz?\\t"class2"
FAIL: g++.dg/other/unused1.C scan-assembler stringz?\\t"printer"
FAIL: g+
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: trunk revision 115451
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/other/unused1.C scan-assembler stringz?\\t"class2"
FAIL: g++.dg/other/unused1.C scan-assembler stringz?\\t"printer"
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 02:53
---
m68k is not a primary or secondary platform.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 03:00
---
I don't think this code is invalid. To instantiate operator(), size_traits
would have to be complete, but that should not prevent the template
declaration.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28280
--- You a
24 matches
Mail list logo