Bug#377310: gcc: [inaccurate] warning: the use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'

Package: gcc Version: 4:4.1.1-3 Severity: normal While compiling binutils-2.17 from (Debian) sources, gcc reports following: bucomm.o: In function `make_tempname': /usr/src/net/deb/src/binutils-2.17/binutils/bucomm.c:426: warning: the use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'

gcc-3.4_3.4.6-3_multi.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.4-doc_3.4.6-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4-doc_3.4.6-3_all.deb cpp-3.4_3.4.6-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4_3.4.6-3_i386.deb cpp-3.4_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb g++-3.4_3.4.6-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g

Processing of gcc-3.4_3.4.6-3_multi.changes

gcc-3.4_3.4.6-3_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-3.4_3.4.6-3.dsc libstdc++6-pic_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb cpp-3.4-doc_3.4.6-3_all.deb libstdc++6-dev_3.4.6-3_i386.deb libg2c0_3.4.6-3_i386.deb g77-3.4-doc_3.4.6-3_all.deb libg2c0-dev_3.4.6-3_powerpc.de

[Bug c/28280] [4.2 regression] bogus "statement with no effect" warning with VLA and typeof

--- Comment #4 from mrs at apple dot com 2006-07-08 10:10 --- Fix submitted. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28280 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#377310: gcc: [inaccurate] warning: the use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'

Jari Aalto wrote: > Package: gcc > Version: 4:4.1.1-3 > Severity: normal > > While compiling binutils-2.17 from (Debian) sources, gcc reports following: > > bucomm.o: In function `make_tempname': > /usr/src/net/deb/src/binutils-2.17/binutils/bucomm.c:426: warning: the > use of `mktemp' i

debian gcc bug #226952 is a duplicate of #128950

Hi, bug report http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=226952 is either a duplicate of http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=128950 or it is invalid. Although the corresponding upstream bug for bug #226952 has been closed as invalid since GCC behaves as it is intended, th

Bug#341882: binutils fix

I'm closing this report as won't fix for 4.0. Please update a patch for 4.1, which should be well prepared. The tedious work will be to add something like a triarchsubdir and have additional multilib files installed into the packages. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

Bug#376096: marked as done (free(): invalid pointer on hppa)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 16:41:47 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#376096: free(): invalid pointer on hppa has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#366873: marked as done (gcc-4.1-source: patch for cross compiler doesn't apply)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 16:36:17 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#366873: These patches aren't needed anymore has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: merge gcc reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 364907 normal Bug#364907: libstdc++6: application crash on throwing/catching exceptions Severity set to `normal' from `important' > merge 364907 365245 Bug#364907: libstdc++6: application crash on throwing/catching exceptions Bug#365245: stran

Processed: tag gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 360504 + wontfix Bug#360504: libmudflap0-dev: Broken symlink in /usr/lib64 There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adminis

Bug#368569: marked as done (debian-testing - fastjar - error when installing the package)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 16:35:18 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fastjar - error when installing the package has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: forwarded gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 358235 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28313 Bug#358235: Please recognize mips64 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28313. > tags 358235 + upstream Bug#358235: Please recognize mips64 There were no tags set. Tags ad

[Bug libffi/28313] libffi has not been ported to mips64-linux-gnu

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-08 14:28 --- mips64*-*);; mips-sgi-irix5.* | mips-sgi-irix6.*) TARGET=MIPS_IRIX; TARGETDIR=mips;; mips*-*-linux*) TARGET=MIPS_LINUX; TARGETDIR=mips;; So yes. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|R

Processed: temprarily reassign to caudium

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 358261 caudium Bug#358261: FTBFS with GCC 4.1: Not using -fPIC to make shared lib. Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.1' to `caudium'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system ad

Bug#358261: temprarily reassign to caudium

reassign 358261 caudium thanks currently FTBFS: *** Found 4 potential problems. touch configure-stamp dh_testdir # Add here commands to compile the package. /usr/bin/make make[1]: Entering directory `/home/packages/tmp/caudium-1.4.7' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/packages/tmp/caudium-1.4.7/s

Bug#372778: marked as done ([PR27884] invalid use of 'register' in linkage specification)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 17:22:21 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line #372778 fixed in gcc-4.1.1-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Bug#337861: fakeroot: [m68k] FTBFS with 1 of 7 tests failed

tags 337861 + needsinfo tags 337861 + needinfo thanks please recheck with gcc-4.1. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325739: Segfault with gcc4 (and above) when using LD_PRELOAD

tags 325739 + needsinfo thanks - please recheck with gcc-4.1 - are the non-free nvidia drivers installed? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: gcc-4.0 segfaults with -O2 dealing with long doubles

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 323426 + needsinfo Unknown tag/s: needsinfo. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l

Processed: Re: fakeroot: [m68k] FTBFS with 1 of 7 tests failed

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 337861 + moreinfo Bug#337861: fakeroot: [m68k] FTBFS with 1 of 7 tests failed There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adm

Processed: Re: [m68k] gcc-4.0 leads to segfault

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 342121 + moreinfo Bug#342121: [m68k] gcc-4.0 leads to segfault There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Deb

Bug#342267: gcc-4.0: boost 1.33.x FTBFS with "cannot handle R_PARISC_PCREL17F..."

tags 342267 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with current gcc-4.1 and gcc-snapshot packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: fakeroot: [m68k] FTBFS with 1 of 7 tests failed

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 337861 + needsinfo Unknown tag/s: needsinfo. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l

Bug#342121: [m68k] gcc-4.0 leads to segfault

tags 342121 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with 4.1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#323426: gcc-4.0 segfaults with -O2 dealing with long doubles

tags 323426 + needsinfo thanks please recheck with gcc-4.1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Segfault with gcc4 (and above) when using LD_PRELOAD

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 325739 + needsinfo Unknown tag/s: needsinfo. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l

Processed: Re: [m68k] ICE when trying to build boost

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 321486 + moreinfo Bug#321486: [m68k] ICE when trying to build boost Tags were: fixed-upstream upstream Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (ad

Bug#322766: marked as done (jc1: internal compiler error: segmentation fault)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 18:08:52 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322766: jc1: internal compiler error: segmentation fault has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#343692: [m68k] ICEs while building gst-ffmpeg -- regression

tags 343692 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with current gcc-4.1 and gcc-snapshot packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: [m68k] ICEs while building gst-ffmpeg -- regression

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 343692 + moreinfo Bug#343692: [m68k] ICEs while building gst-ffmpeg -- regression There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#343898: fix for unreadable error messages in g++ when #define'ing min or max

will you update the patch? Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#321486: [m68k] ICE when trying to build boost

tags 321486 + moreinfo thanks Please recheck with gcc-4.1 / gcc-snapshot -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#376427: gcc-4.0: arm-linux cross build mistakenly invokes native assembler

Bill Gatliff writes: > Package: gcc-4.0 > Version: 4.0.3-3 > Severity: important > > *** Please type your report below this line *** > > When using dpkg-cross to construct an arm-linux cross compiler, > the gcc build dies as shown below. The error message suggests > that xgcc is invoking the nat

Processed: forwarded gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 345587 + upstream Bug#345587: cpp-4.0: x86/powerpc inconsistency for the __linux macro There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > forwarded 28314 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28314 Bug number 28314 not found. > retitle 345587 [PR28314] cpp: x86/power

Processed: tagging GCC reprot

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 328421 + upstream Bug#328421: Complex gcc3.3/gcc4 interaction causes applications to segfault There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > forwarded 328421 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24660 Bug#328421: Complex gcc3.3/gcc4 interaction causes application

Bug#330521: marked as done (different results for different parameters order)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 18:30:49 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line different results for different parameters order has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#330595: Reassign to atlas3, please add feedback, close or reassign

tags 330595 + moreinfo reassign 330595 atlas3 thanks Camm, please recheck with the current compiler version. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Reassign to atlas3, please add feedback, close or reassign

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 330595 + moreinfo Bug#330595: Miscompilation with -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -funroll-all-loops Tags were: unreproducible Tags added: moreinfo > reassign 330595 atlas3 Bug#330595: Miscompilation with -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -funroll-all-loops Bug r

[Bug target/28314] cpp: x86/powerpc inconsistency for the __linux macro

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|preprocessor|target http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28314 --- Yo

Processed: Re: gcc-4.0: hidden symbol `__gcov_init' is referenced by DSO

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 355621 + moreinfo Bug#355621: gcc-4.0: hidden symbol `__gcov_init' is referenced by DSO There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administ

Bug#357062: marked as done (libstdc++6-4.0-dev: 32-bit includes missing on amd64 (no /u/i/c++/4.0/i486-linux-gnu))

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 19:33:21 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line libstdc++6-4.0-dev: 32-bit includes missing on amd64 (no /u/i/c++/4.0/i486-linux-gnu) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#355621: gcc-4.0: hidden symbol `__gcov_init' is referenced by DSO

tags 355621 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with gcc-4.1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#347808: marked as done (please configure gcc-3.4/gcc-4.0 on i386 with --with-arch=i486 --with-tune=i686)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 18:50:20 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#347808: please configure gcc-3.4/gcc-4.0 on i386 with --with-arch=i486 --with-tune=i686 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Processed: forwarded GCC report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 355909 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28316 Bug#355909: g++-4.0: Internal compiler error in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:11539 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28316. > tags 355909 + upstream Bug#355909: g++-4.0

Processed: forwarded gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 352790 + upstream Bug#352790: gcc-4.0: gcc doesn't use locale for default input charset Tags were: upstream Tags added: upstream > forwarded 352790 http://bugs.debian.org/PR28315 Bug#352790: gcc-4.0: gcc doesn't use locale for default input charse

[Bug c++/28316] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:11645

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-08 17:34 --- Confirmed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCON

[Bug libgcj/28312] peer libraries are installed into gcjversionedlibdir, not into nativeexeclib

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-08 17:37 --- Confirmed. (And things keep changing...) -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

Processed: tag gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 367799 + pending Bug#367799: gcc-4.0:Duplicate patch for gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/switch-1.c There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Processed: Re: Bug#367709: requesting libstdc++ .udeb in order to produce c++ based images based on d-i technology (but not d-i).

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 367709 tech-ctte Bug#367709: requesting libstdc++ .udeb in order to produce c++ based images based on d-i technology (but not d-i). Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.0,tech-ctte' to `tech-ctte'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please con

Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3

tags 347697 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with gcc-4.1 (from unstable) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tag gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 358076 + wontfix Bug#358076: g++-4.0: fails to locate std C++ headers (eg, typeinfo) Tags were: unreproducible Tags added: wontfix > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Processed: forwarded gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 373909 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23817 Bug#373909: g++-4.0: template function returning nested class fails to compile when defined outside of its class Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23817. > tags 373909

Processed: Re: Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 347697 + moreinfo Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3 Tags were: moreinfo Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bu

Bug#367709: requesting libstdc++ .udeb in order to produce c++ based images based on d-i technology (but not d-i).

reassign 367709 tech-ctte thanks > After some more discussion on IRC, we noticed that there are different > interpretations of what the gcc maintainers supposed to have said. For > this reason, I'm re-assigning this bug report to also gcc-4.0. > > Matthias, is there any decision from you whether

Bug#366204: gcc-4.0: dangling symlinks

tags 366204 + wontfix thanks Florian Schlichting writes: > Package: gcc-4.0 > Version: 4.0.3-1 > Severity: minor > > gcc-4.0 puts three dangling symlinks on my system - is that meant to be > the case? yes, these are resolved by the lib64stdc++6 package; we do not depend on that package by defaul

Processed: forwarded gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 342126 + upstream Bug#342126: Function names starting with $ make assembler barf There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > forwarded 342126 http://bugs.debian.org/PR28318 Bug#342126: Function names starting with $ make assembler barf Noted yo

Bug#376412: gcc-4.0-doc: s/DegaGnu/DejaGnu/; s/incorrekt/incorrect/; gccint.html

Justin Pryzby writes: > Package: gcc-4.0-doc > Version: 4.0.3-3 > Severity: minor > > s/DegaGnu/DejaGnu/; s/incorrekt/incorrect/; gccint.html incorrekt is correct (same as incomplet). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT

Bug#339495: marked as done (cpp-4.0-doc: cpp support "-O" option but not documented)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:04:21 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339495: cpp-4.0-doc: cpp support "-O" option but not documented has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

[Bug c++/28317] template function returning nested class fails to compile when defined outside of its class

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-08 18:20 --- You are missing a 'typename'. Inner is a dependent type, so it needs to read template typename Outer::Inner Outer::get() const { return Inner(); } -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org

Processed: Re: Bug#366204: gcc-4.0: dangling symlinks

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 366204 + wontfix Bug#366204: gcc-4.0: dangling symlinks There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

[Bug c/28318] error message could be better

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-08 18:40 --- I don't think '$' is a valid identifier, though it is been treated as such. But I confirm the problem. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c/28318] error message could be better

--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-08 18:41 --- /tmp/ccX1KBFb.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccX1KBFb.s:9: Error: missing or invalid immediate expression `' taken as 0 Shouldn't this be filed against binutils and not GCC? $ is a valid indentifier in GNU C (GNU C a

[Bug c/28318] error message could be better

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-08 18:43 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Implementation_002ddefined-behavior.html#Implementation_002ddefined-behavior GCC allows the `$' character in identifiers as an extension for most targets. This is true regardless of

[Bug c/28318] error message could be better

--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-08 18:46 --- That page is linked from http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Identifiers-implementation.html#Identifiers-implementation Which is in turned linked from the full implementation defined page. So this is a binutils issue

[Bug c/28319] sentinel attribute should support non-NULL sentinels

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-08 18:50 --- The only time I can think this comes up is that the sentinel is -1. But sentinels are really there so you don't just pass 0 to the function which will fail on some 64bit targets. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/

Bug#376468: Should use xargs --no-run-if-empty

> $ fakeroot debian/rules clean > [...] > find debian/patches -name '*.dpatch' -type f ! -perm 644 | xargs chmod 644 > chmod: missing operand after `644' > Try `chmod --help' for more information. > make: [clean] Error 123 (ignored) > > This command line should use xargs --no-run-if-empty to avoid

Bug#357900: gcc-4.0: Please detect and warn about 2 argument mode() called with O_CREAT

Justin Pryzby writes: > Package: gcc-4.0 > Version: 4.0.3-1 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: upstream > > mode(2) reads: > >mode must be specified when O_CREAT is in the flags, and is >ignored otherwise. > > I straced the result of > > open(buf, O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_EXCL); >

Processed: forwarded gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 337340 http://bugs.debian.org/PR28319 Bug#337340: sentinel attribute should support non-NULL sentinels Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://bugs.debian.org/PR28319. > retitle 337340 [PR28319] sentinel attribute should s

Bug#312367: Re: Bug#312367: gcc-3.3: D support

Please have a look at the gcj-4.1 source package, how java is now built. The same thing could be done with D. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug c++/28316] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:11645

-- fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot |

Bug#226952: [PR 13945] -Wconversion behaviour

Upstream wrote: I think we may close this bug report since either: * The solution is to split the functionality of Wconversion as conceived by the Wcoercion project http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Wcoercion#Background. In that case, this is a duplicate of bug 9072. * The message is misleading. Maybe it

Bug#373909: marked as done (g++-4.0: template function returning nested class fails to compile when defined outside of its class)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 21:30:41 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [Bug c++/28317] template function returning nested class fails to compile when defined outside of its class (forwarded from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org) has caused the attached Bug report to

Processed: fixed gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 278310 [fixed in 4.2] g++-3.3: external linkage of functions declared > in an anonymous namespace Bug#278310: g++-3.3: external linkage of functions declared in an anonymous namespace Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Ple

gnat-doc REMOVED from testing

FYI: The status of the gnat-doc source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 3.15p-1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Package not in unstable The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint file

Bug#343692: [m68k] ICEs while building gst-ffmpeg -- regression

* Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-08 17:50]: > tags 343692 + moreinfo > thanks > > please recheck with current gcc-4.1 and gcc-snapshot packages. Works with 4.1.2 20060613. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "

Bug#342121: [m68k] gcc-4.0 leads to segfault

* Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-08 17:44]: > tags 342121 + moreinfo > thanks > > please recheck with 4.1 Works with 4.1.2 20060613. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P

Processed: forwarded gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 354700 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28321 Bug#354700: gcc 4 does not notice C syntax error Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28321. > tags 354700 + upstream Bug#354700: gcc 4 does not notice C syntax error There

Processed: Re: FTBFS for cross compilation

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 341331 + wontfix Bug#341331: FTBFS for cross compilation There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bug

Processed: reassign gnat report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 329693 gnat Bug#329693: gnat: Run-time error not detected, RM 9.4(20) Bug reassigned from package `gnat-3.4' to `gnat'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (ad

Processed: Re: gcc-3.4: boost 1.33.x FTBFS with "cannot handle R_PARISC_PCREL17F..."

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 342245 + wontfix Bug#342245: gcc-3.4: boost 1.33.x FTBFS with "cannot handle R_PARISC_PCREL17F..." Tags were: moreinfo Tags added: wontfix > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system a

Processed: forwarded gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 367657 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28322 Bug#367657: GCC new warnings and compatibility Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28322. > tags 367657 + upstream Bug#367657: GCC new warnings and compatibility There wer

Bug#341331: marked as done (FTBFS for cross compilation)

Your message dated Sun, 9 Jul 2006 01:19:22 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line FTBFS for cross compilation has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#342245: marked as done (gcc-3.4: boost 1.33.x FTBFS with "cannot handle R_PARISC_PCREL17F...")

Your message dated Sun, 9 Jul 2006 01:14:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gcc-3.4: boost 1.33.x FTBFS with "cannot handle R_PARISC_PCREL17F..." has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#337861: marked as done (fakeroot: [m68k] FTBFS with 1 of 7 tests failed)

Your message dated Sun, 9 Jul 2006 02:27:52 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fakeroot: [m68k] FTBFS with 1 of 7 tests failed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Al-Manahel Newsletter List Unsubscription

The removal of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Date of this removal: Sat Jul 8 18:26:19 2006 Please save this email message for future reference. --

Bug#357062: closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: libstdc++6-4.0-dev: 32-bit includes missing on amd64 (no /u/i/c++/4.0/i486-linux-gnu))

retitle 357062 libstdc++6-4.1-dev: 32-bit includes missing on amd64 (no /u/i/c++/4.1/i486-linux-gnu) reassign 357062 libstdc++6-4.1-dev 4.1.1-7 reopen 357062 thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes: > Version: 4.0.3-4 > > at least they are present in this version. So they a

Processed: Re: Bug#357062 closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: libstdc++6-4.0-dev: 32-bit includes missing on amd64 (no /u/i/c++/4.0/i486-linux-gnu))

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 357062 libstdc++6-4.1-dev: 32-bit includes missing on amd64 (no > /u/i/c++/4.1/i486-linux-gnu) Bug#357062: libstdc++6-4.0-dev: 32-bit includes missing on amd64 (no /u/i/c++/4.0/i486-linux-gnu) Changed Bug title. (By the way, that Bug is curren