--
fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot
|
--- Comment #3 from varg at theor dot jinr dot ru 2006-07-05 05:44 ---
The error message given by g++-3.4:
test.cc: In member function `void foo::operator()(T1&, T3&)':
test.cc:14: error: non-constant `foo::N_BC' cannot be used as template
argument
test.cc:14: error: template argument 3
--- Comment #14 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-07-05 11:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=11826)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11826&action=view)
split current functionality of Wconversion in two different options
This patch divides the functionality of Wcon
--- Comment #16 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-07-05 11:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=11828)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11828&action=view)
detect implicit conversions where a value may change
patch 3of3 http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Wcoercion#Background
De
--- Comment #15 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-07-05 11:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=11827)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11827&action=view)
Adds a new function which detects when a real value can be exactly represented
as an integer.
Patch 2of3 http://
--- Comment #8 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-07-05 11:34 ---
I think we may close this bug report since either:
* The solution is to split the functionality of Wconversion as conceived by the
Wcoercion project http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Wcoercion#Background. In that case,
this is
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-05 11:37 ---
See comment #1, this is how it is intended.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
The subscription of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set. Thanks for subscribing!
Date of this subscription: Wed Jul 5 06:05:35 2006
Please save this email message for future reference.
-
Accepted:
cpp-4.1_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb
fastjar_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fastjar_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb
fixincludes_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fixincludes_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb
g++-4.1_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-05 13:36 ---
With checking enabled we have
obj2/gcc> ./cc1plus -quiet -O2 t.ii
t.ii: In static member function 'static IntType
boost::random::const_mod::mult_schrage(IntType, IntType) [with
IntType = int, IntType m = 2147483647]
Package: g++-4.1
Severity: normal
Hello, GCC maintainers. When compiling k3d package, in some part I have
the following error:
.libs/user_interface.o:(.data+0x0): multiple definition of
`_ZN5boost9date_time18parse_match_resultIT_E11PARSE_ERRORE'
.libs/black_box_recorder.o:(.data+0x0): f
gcc-4.1_4.1.1-7_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb
libgcc1_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb
protoize_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb
fixincludes_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb
libmudflap0_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb
libmudflap0-dev_4.1.1-7_alph
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 376616 -1
Bug#376616: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: warning: statement with no effect
Bug 376616 cloned as bug 376895.
> reassign 376616 gcc-snapshot 20060626-1
Bug#376616: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: warning: statement with no effect
Bug reassigned from package `
Package: gcc
Version: 4:4.0.3-4
gcc -v
gcc version 4.0.4 20060507 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.3-3)
Hi!
I use testing version of debian with gcc4, and it compiles the following c
code wrong way:
#include
int a=13;
int t[1]={13};
int b=13;
int *p;
int main()
{
p=&b;
printf("a:%d t[0]:%d *
The removal of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set.
Date of this removal: Wed Jul 5 10:14:12 2006
Please save this email message for future reference.
--
Your message dated Wed, 05 Jul 2006 19:40:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376901: gcc4 (*p)+=(*p=6) bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
--- Comment #7 from apl at alum dot mit dot edu 2006-07-05 18:50 ---
I think that this fix may have been too aggressive. I have a templated class
with a member function that does a dynamic_cast<>. With 4.2, I'm getting
errors when
I compile this template, despite the fact that I don't
--
apl at alum dot mit dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||28275
nThis||
http://gcc.gnu.
--- Comment #8 from apl at alum dot mit dot edu 2006-07-05 19:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=11835)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11835&action=view)
protection against dynamic_cast<> with -fno-rtti is too eager
Here's a test that NEVER instantiates the template,
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-05 20:38 ---
This is intended behavior: a non-POD type which has been marked as packed can
be used as a packed field. 13983 and 17519 are bugs in that feature.
In this case, nonpod_pack::n is not packed, so it is safe to pack fie
Your message dated Wed, 5 Jul 2006 23:45:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376213: [amd64] : compiler produces wrong code for <<
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 06:20:27PM +0200, NyOS wrote:
> printf("a:%d t[0]:%d *p:%d\n",a,t[0],*p);
> a+=(a=2)+(a=3);
Modifies one value multiple times without sequence point: Undefined
behaviour.
> t[0]+=(t[0]=2)+(t[0]=3);
Modifies one value multiple times without sequence point: Undefined
Accepted:
cpp-doc_4.1.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp-doc_4.1.1-2_i386.deb
cpp_4.1.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.1.1-2_i386.deb
g++_4.1.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_4.1.1-2_i386.deb
g77-doc_3.4.6-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g77-doc_3
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
gnat-doc_4.1.1-2_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says doc.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the package wro
gcc-defaults_1.37_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-defaults_1.37.dsc
gcc-defaults_1.37.tar.gz
cpp_4.1.1-2_i386.deb
cpp-doc_4.1.1-2_i386.deb
gcc_4.1.1-2_i386.deb
gcc-doc_4.1.1-2_i386.deb
gnat_4.1.1-2_i386.deb
gnat-doc_4.1.1-2_i386.deb
g++_4.
--
Bug 26670 depends on bug 13983, which changed state.
Bug 13983 Summary: no warning on some non-POD struct with packed attribute
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13983
What|Old Value |New Value
--
--
Bug 26670 depends on bug 17519, which changed state.
Bug 17519 Summary: [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Warning for array of packed non-POD
in packed struct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17519
What|Old Value |New Value
---
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-06 03:48 ---
Hmm, actually comment #2 does seem like a bug, both foos should compile
cleanly.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
29 matches
Mail list logo
