Package: gpc-2.1-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-1
Severity: normal
gpc-2.1-4.1 is the only version of GNU Pascal Compiler installed on this
system, but a symbolic link from gpc was *not* created when I installed
gpc-2.1-4.1.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 322766 - fixed
Bug#322766: jc1: internal compiler error: segmentation fault
Tags were: fixed
Tags removed: fixed
> tags 322776 + fixed
Bug#322776: libnet-daemon-perl: please remove symlinks in /usr/doc
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
St
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 04:38:23PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 12:03:40PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > please send a fix. I do not intend to touch this code. it's fixed in
> > > the 3.4, 4.0 and 4.1 packages.
> >
> > Hello Matthias,
>
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 10:55:34AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> I see a NMU by Steinar being rejected due to bad versions.
Yes. I was going to upload another one, but was told that Thiemo would make
an upload this weekend anyhow, so I let it be. Thiemo, OTOH, told me that
Matthias Klose got ther
Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 04:38:23PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 12:03:40PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > please send a fix. I do not intend to touch this code. it's fixed in
> > > > the 3.4, 4.0 and 4.1 packa
gcc-4.1_4.1.1-2_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
g++-4.1_4.1.1-2_hppa.deb
libgcc4_4.1.1-2_hppa.deb
libobjc1_4.1.1-2_hppa.deb
gnat-4.1_4.1.1-2_powerpc.deb
gfortran-4.1_4.1.1-2_i386.deb
libgnat-4.1_4.1.1-2_hppa.deb
libffi4-dev_4.1.1-2_hppa.deb
cpp
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.1-2_hppa.deb: package says section is libs, override says
devel.
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.1-2_i386.deb: package says section is libs, override says
devel.
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.1-2_po
Accepted:
cpp-4.1-doc_4.1.1-2_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1-doc_4.1.1-2_all.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.1-2_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.1-2_hppa.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.1-2_i386.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.1-2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-
Thiemo Seufer writes:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 04:38:23PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 12:03:40PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > > please send a fix. I do not intend to touch this code. it's fixed in
>
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jun 2006 03:17:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370320: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jun 2006 03:17:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#356569: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 5 Jun 2006 12:23:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370417: gpc-2.1-4.1: when gpc-2.1-41 is only gpc
installed, no symbolic link from gpc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jun 2006 03:17:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370308: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jun 2006 03:17:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366744: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jun 2006 03:17:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362307: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
--- Comment #13 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 10:41 ---
Unassigning rth, since he's obviously not actually interested in fixing this.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Martin Michlmayr writes:
> * Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-04 21:01]:
> > As we are below the 20 packages count if bug #366820 is correct (and
> > Martin just confirmed the number), it is ok to do the switch now.
> > Martin, can you please also mark these bugs as serious now (as
> > th
--- Comment #14 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 10:44 ---
The failures in 3.4 and later are in fold_const, so the gen_lowpart problem is
now avoided by, well, ICEing earlier :)
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |A
Package: libgcj7-dev
Version: 4.1.0-2j1
Severity: grave
This package installs jni.h in /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.1/include/.
This only works if you happen to use gcc 4.1.1 to compile the C program
you're dealing with, but my gcc thinks it's version 4.0.4:
$ gcc -print-search-dirs
install: /
--- Comment #10 from stuart at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 19:14 ---
Subject: Bug 26557
Author: stuart
Date: Mon Jun 5 19:14:11 2006
New Revision: 114403
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114403
Log:
Radar 4561329
PR middle-end/26557
* st
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #369710
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27804
# * remote status changed: UNCONFIRMED -> RESOLVED
# * remote r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 367709 gcc-4.0,tech-ctte
Bug#367709: requesting libstdc++ .udeb in order to produce c++ based images
based on d-i technology (but not d-i).
Bug reassigned from package `tech-ctte' to `gcc-4.0,tech-ctte'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pl
Your message dated Mon, 5 Jun 2006 21:20:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line rmic.1.gz is a dangling symlink
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 5 Jun 2006 21:18:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line java-gcj-compat_1.0.56-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
Your message dated Mon, 5 Jun 2006 21:14:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370518: placing jni.h in versioned subdirectory makes no
sense
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status rep
Your message dated Mon, 5 Jun 2006 21:18:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line java-gcj-compat_1.0.56-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Jun 1 15:15:27 UTC 2006 (revision 114308)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c954025
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2316
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tes
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Jun 1 15:15:27 UTC 2006 (revision 114308)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c36204d
FAIL: cd5014e
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2315
# of unexpected failures2
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 4 18:50:03 UTC 2006 (revision 114362)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2317
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running ta
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 4 18:50:03 UTC 2006 (revision 114362)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2317
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 4 18:50:03 UTC 2006 (revision 114362)
Native configuration is i486-linux-gnu (gargleblaster)
=== gpc tests ===
Running target any
FAIL: asmtest.pas
FAIL: fjf322.pas
FAIL: fjf395a.pas
FAIL: fjf395b.pas
FAIL: fjf403b.pas
FAIL: fjf563e.pas
FAIL: fjf587b.pas
F
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 4 18:50:03 UTC 2006 (revision 114362)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: ce2110a
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2316
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 4 18:50:03 UTC 2006 (revision 114362)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c36204d
FAIL: cd5014e
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2315
# of unexpected failures2
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20060508-1
Forwarded as PR27907.
> Automatic build of libfann1_1.2.0-1 on juist by sbuild/alpha 0.44
...
> alpha-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../src/include -D_REENTRANT
> -Wall -g -O2 -MT doublefann.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/doublefann.Tpo -c
> doublefann.
Package: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.35
Severity: wishlist
Please go ahead and make gcc-4.1 the default for m68k.
We're not currently a release candidate and we likely won't be a
release candidate if we can't move to 4.1 due to all the fixes.
This has the support of the porters and RMs.
Thanks,
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 03:23:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367951: devel/gcc missing in testing / amd64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#370320: gcc-4.1: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD (CRLF in dpatch),
which was filed against the gcc-4.1 package.
Thanks for fixing gcc-4.1 on kFreeBSD.
Please, could you also upload this fixed version
as gcj-4.1 4.1.1-2 to fix gcj-4.1 on kFreeBSD
38 matches
Mail list logo
