Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

2006-05-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status rep

[bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

2006-05-28 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #366939 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27571 # * remote status changed: NEW -> RESOLVED # * remote resolutio

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

2006-05-28 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #356569 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26757 # * remote status changed: NEW -> REOPENED usertags 356569 - status-N

Bug#341331: FTBFS for cross compilation

2006-05-28 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> Nikita, still interested in fixing that for 3.4, or should we close > that as wontfix? It's not very likely that activity on cross stuff will be restored soon :(. However, some time ago, Wartan Hachaturov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> agreed to take the cross compiler packaging work. So I am readdressin

Re: Bug#366873: gcc-4.1-source: patch for cross compiler doesn't apply

2006-05-28 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> Jonas Meyer writes: >> Package: gcc-4.1-source >> Severity: normal >> >> >> cross-configure.dpatch doesn't apply when following the instructions in >> README.cross. > >> Indeed building according to README.cross doesn't work, because those >> patches don't apply. However, when simply skippi

Bug#341331: FTBFS for cross compilation

2006-05-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Nikita V. Youshchenko writes: > > > Nikita, still interested in fixing that for 3.4, or should we close > > that as wontfix? > > It's not very likely that activity on cross stuff will be restored soon :(. > However, some time ago, Wartan Hachaturov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> agreed to take > the cross

why -m64 enabled for x86?

2006-05-28 Thread Coywolf Qi Hunt
Hi, Why -m64 enabled by default for x86? This is debian sid. Both debian gcc3 and gcc4 have -m64 enabled. Thanks! -- Coywolf Qi Hunt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]