reopen 364602
tags 364602 - fixed fixed-upstream
thanks
While the test case submitted to GCC now compiles, the original
software (gambit) still shows this bug. Working on a new test case
now.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 364602
Bug#364602: ICE: SSA corruption: Conflict across an abnormal edge
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 364602 - fixed fixed-upstream
Bug#364602: ICE: SSA corruption: Conflict across an abnormal edge
Tags were: fixed fixed-upstream
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 364602 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27548
Bug#364602: ICE: SSA corruption: Conflict across an abnormal edge
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27283 to
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27548.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
--- Comment #19 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-05-11 11:03 ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Created an attachment (id=11336)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11336&action=view) [edit]
> Possible patch
>
> Maybe. there is a work around I have an initial patch for. It
--- Comment #9 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-05-11 11:05 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> 4.1.0 is correct as it is the same as 3.4.x. 4.0.x is incorrect and does not
> correspond to 3.4.x. So this is a bug in 4.0.x and not in 4.1.0.
>
> Confirmed. Thanks for the short testcase.
Do
Matthias Klose wrote:
Please could you recheck using gcc-4.1 / g++-4.1 as the compiler to
build your application?
yes it is still crashing with g++-4.1, however:
it seems that this only happens when i link against libGL (i am linking
against 2 dozens of libs so it took some time to detect thi
--- Comment #16 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-11 14:17 ---
Subject: Bug 27158
Author: sayle
Date: Thu May 11 14:17:19 2006
New Revision: 113695
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113695
Log:
PR target/27158
* reload.c (find_reloads_toplev
gcc-4.1_4.1.0-4_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libgnat-4.1_4.1.0-4_powerpc.deb
lib64mudflap0_4.1.0-4_powerpc.deb
lib64stdc++6_4.1.0-4_powerpc.deb
libstdc++6-4.1-dev_4.1.0-4_i386.deb
lib64stdc++6-4.1-dbg_4.1.0-4_i386.deb
gcc-4.1-hppa64_4.1.0-4_hppa
Accepted:
cpp-4.1-doc_4.1.0-4_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1-doc_4.1.0-4_all.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.0-4_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.0-4_hppa.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.0-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.0-4_i386.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.0-4_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.0-4_hppa.deb: package says section is libs, override says
devel.
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.0-4_i386.deb: package says section is libs, override says
devel.
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.0-4_po
--- Comment #17 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-11 16:19
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Your message dated Thu, 11 May 2006 09:32:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366733: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
--- Comment #6 from halcy0n at gentoo dot org 2006-05-11 17:01 ---
You can't build with objc-gc at all right now since only half of these patches
were applied. It tries to use the internal boehm-gc, but that hasn't been
built yet since the patch in the first email was never applied. Af
Package: gcc-4.1-source
Severity: normal
cross-configure.dpatch doesn't apply when following the instructions in
README.cross.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/
Уважаемый пользователь.
Данное письмо НЕ является спамом.
Это действительно выгодное предложение, от которого будет трудно
отказаться. Это сообщение посылается вам только один раз, и если вы его
проигнорируете, то кто знает, может быть в будущем пожалеете об этом...
Здравствуйте,
Убедительная
15 matches
Mail list logo