Bug#361577: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: xgcc: Error: bignum invalid

2006-04-09 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: pocketpc-gcc Version: 3.4.2-2 Your package fails to build with GCC 4.2. Version 4.2 has not been released yet but I'm building with a snapshot in order to find errors and give people an advance warning. I'm not sure if the bug below indicates a bug in your package or in GCC - presumably

Bug#361024: glibc test packages

2006-04-09 Thread Sheplyakov Alexei
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 04:47:05PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > Please, could you also test glibc test package at > http://sci.felk.cvut.cz/~salinger/glibc/ This fixes problem with loading Guile modules. My test case do not fail any more, as well as test case from #226716. Thank you very much

Bug#361591: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

2006-04-09 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20060325-1 internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed: > Automatic build of mail-notification_2.0.dfsg.1-2 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 > 1.112 ... > cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -pthread -DORBIT2=1 -DXTHREADS > -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include

Bug#361602: internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed

2006-04-09 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20060325-1 Okay, fair enough, the headers are not in the package, but GCC shouldn't ICE... | dll_main.cpp:190: internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed > Automatic build of stlport4.6_4.6.2-3 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 1.112 ... > c++ -pthread -fexceptions

Bug#361591: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

2006-04-09 Thread Falk Hueffner
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> mn-sylpheed-mailbox-backend.c:301: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed > > It builds just fine with 4.1 Since verify_ssa isn't called in release versions, this doesn't mean a lot... -- Falk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT

Bug#361637: gcc-3.3: takes too much RAM when compiling const arrays

2006-04-09 Thread Silas S. Brown
Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.5-13 Severity: minor I tried to compile flite (Festival Lite, the speech synthesizer) using gcc. One of the source files is a 7.5-megabyte C file with no includes and the only thing it contains is a single array of the form const char array[]={142,152,276,371, ...

Processed: Re: Bug#360895: ImportError: libstdc++.so.6: cannot handle TLS data

2006-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 360895 libstdc++6 Bug#360895: ImportError: libstdc++.so.6: cannot handle TLS data Bug reassigned from package `python2.4' to `libstdc++6'. > severity 360895 critical Bug#360895: ImportError: libstdc++.so.6: cannot handle TLS data Severity set

Processed: merge gcc report

2006-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > block 360895 by 361675 Bug#360895: ImportError: libstdc++.so.6: cannot handle TLS data Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 361675 > merge 360895 361024 Bug#360895: ImportError: libstdc++.so.6: cannot handle TLS data Bug#361024: libstdc++6

[Patch] #4: various cleanups

2006-04-09 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Remove some old clutter from debian/rules2 and debian/rules.patch (please review before approving, of course) -- Ludovic Brenta. --- rules.defs~ +++ rules.defsSun Apr 9 16:49:15 2006 +0200 @@ -300,18 +300,15 @@ endif endif ifeq ($(with_java),yes) with_libgcj := yes + enabled_lan

[Patch] #3: ada-driver

2006-04-09 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Accept GCC 4.1 as a bootstrap compiler. -- Ludovic Brenta. --- patches/ada-driver.dpatch~ +++ patches/ada-driver.dpatch @@ -28,10 +28,11 @@ exit 0 --- gcc/aclocal.m4~Sat Mar 2 00:37:42 2002 +++ gcc/aclocal.m4 Sat Apr 6 13:01:36 2002 -@@ -312,6 +312,9 @@ +@@ -312,6 +312,10 @@

Compiling a special asm-statment will fail if -O1 -fgcse is set.

2006-04-09 Thread Dieter Schuster
>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Dieter Schuster >Organization: >Confidential: no >Synopsis: Compiling a special asm-statment will fail if -O1 -fgcse is set. >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: >Class: rejects-legal >Release: 3.4.6 (Debian 3.4

Re: Bug#361024: Simple test case [Was: libstdc++.so.6: cannot handle TLS data]

2006-04-09 Thread frederic
Hi all I don't know if I can write to you, but i've no more idea First: - Excuse for my english (i'm frenchy), and i'm not a power user of Linux (just a basic user since 3 years) My system: - Debian Etch with kernel 2.4.27, - libc6 2.3.5-6 (I do not upgrade to 2.3.6-3 because of bug who are

[Bug tree-optimization/27093] [4.2 Regression] verify_ssa failed: definition does not dominate use

2006-04-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-09 17:50 --- Confirmed, this is a regression. There might be already a dup of this but I don't have time to find it right now. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Adde

Bug#361024: note on "2.4 is deprecated"

2006-04-09 Thread Joey Hess
I just wanted to comment on the "2.4 is deprecated" thing. Just because the kernel team is muttering[1] about not supporting the 2.4 kernel does not mean that Debian as a project has decided not to support users using their own versions of this kernel. As Steve notes in #361024, we have to support

Bug#361715: segfaults compiling pari_2.1.7-2

2006-04-09 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20060325-1 This is a regression from 4.1: > Automatic build of pari_2.1.7-2 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 1.112 ... > cc -c -O3 -DGCC_INLINE -Wall -Wno-implicit -fomit-frame-pointer -g > -D_REENTRANT -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -I. -I../src/headers -o trans2.o > ../sr

Bug#361715: Log for failed build of barrage_1.0.2-1

2006-04-09 Thread Martin Michlmayr
I also get a segfaul with barrage_1.0.2-1. Unless I made a mistake, delta reduced it to the same test case as for pari_2.1.7-2 so I assume they are the same bug. I've attached the preprocessed source just in case. > Automatic build of barrage_1.0.2-1 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 1.112 ... > gcc -DHA

Bug#361715: segfaults compiling pari_2.1.7-2

2006-04-09 Thread Falk Hueffner
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> ../src/basemath/trans2.c: In function 'mpbern': >> ../src/basemath/trans2.c:862: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault I cannot reproduce this with 4.2.0 20060407 on alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu. So either it's target specific, or already fixed

Bug#361715: segfaults compiling pari_2.1.7-2

2006-04-09 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-09 22:54]: > >> ../src/basemath/trans2.c: In function 'mpbern': > >> ../src/basemath/trans2.c:862: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault > > I cannot reproduce this with 4.2.0 20060407 on > alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu. So either it's target specif

Processed: forwarded 361407

2006-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 361407 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27094 Bug#361407: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree_list Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27094. > tags 361407 + upstream Bug#361407: internal compiler error

Bug#361024: note on "2.4 is deprecated"

2006-04-09 Thread Warren Turkal
Not that my opinion means much, but... On Sunday 09 April 2006 12:14, Joey Hess wrote: *snip* >  - Debian's userland has *always* supported at least the previous major >    kernel version, and most often the previous two, or sometimes I >    think, three major kernel versions. I think it could

Bug#361024: note on "2.4 is deprecated"

2006-04-09 Thread Warren Turkal
On Sunday 09 April 2006 12:14, Joey Hess wrote: >  - Debian's userland has *always* supported at least the previous major >    kernel version, and most often the previous two, or sometimes I >    think, three major kernel versions. I think it could be easily argued that the last three major revisi

[Bug c++/27094] tree check: expected tree_list, have omp_return in build_call

2006-04-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openmp http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27094 --- Yo

[Bug c++/27094] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected tree_list, have omp_return in build_call

2006-04-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|tree check: expected|[4.2 Regression] tree check: |tree_list, have omp_r

[Bug c++/27094] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected tree_list, have omp_return in build_call

2006-04-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-09 21:38 --- I could not reproduce this with the default gc params for checking but could with: --param ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heapsize=0 Which means this is a GC issue. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug c++/27094] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected tree_list, have omp_return in build_call

2006-04-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-09 21:40 --- Reducing. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27094 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT

Bug#360776: libstdc++ test packages

2006-04-09 Thread Blars Blarson
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 12:57:58AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > please check with the (i386) libstdc++6 test package at > > http://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/ Installation fails: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libstdc++6: libstdc++6 depends on gcc-4.1-base (= 4.1.0-2)

Bug#360776: Bug#361024: Bug#361221: libstdc++ test packages

2006-04-09 Thread Gordon Haverland
On Saturday 08 April 2006 16:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 12:57:58AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > please check with the (i386) libstdc++6 test package at > > > > http://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/ > > I have made some more tests. First the package looks ok, but it > do