Do not ignore me please,
a
bI found your email somewhere and naow decided to write you.
I am caoming to your place in few weeks and thought we
can meet each aother. Let me know if you do naot mind.
I am a nice pretty girl. Don't reply to this bemail.
Email me direclty at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
gcc-4.0_4.0.3-1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cpp-4.0_4.0.3-1_powerpc.deb
fastjar_4.0.3-1_hppa.deb
g++-4.0_4.0.3-1_i386.deb
gnat-4.0_4.0.3-1_powerpc.deb
lib64objc1_4.0.3-1_powerpc.deb
treelang-4.0_4.0.3-1_powerpc.deb
libstdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.3-1_
Accepted:
cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.3-1_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.3-1_all.deb
cpp-4.0_4.0.3-1_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.3-1_hppa.deb
cpp-4.0_4.0.3-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.3-1_i386.deb
cpp-4.0_4.0.3-1_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-
Your message dated Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:47:29 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342557: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:47:29 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355439: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
tags 356316 +patch
thanks
This turned out to be pretty trivial to fix, though it then took
something like 5 hours to rebuild gcc and test it!
--- gcc/cp/class.c~ 2006-03-11 13:28:45.0 +
+++ gcc/cp/class.c 2006-03-11 13:30:19.0 +
@@ -5073,9 +5073,7 @@
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 356316 +patch
Bug#356316: g++-4.0: -Wnon-virtual-dtor and -Wall produce false warnings
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
Package: g++-4.1
Version: 4.1.0-0
Severity: important
Where a base class has a destructor defined inline, g++ may generate
code for a derived class's destructor that calls an non-inline version
of the base class destructor, but without generating code for the
latter. This is normally masked by th
8 matches
Mail list logo