[Bug preprocessor/24202] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Segfault with #pragma once

--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 13:37 --- *** Bug 24271 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/24272] strange link error with ACE

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 13:42 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19664 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug libstdc++/19664] libstdc++ headers should have pop/push of the visibility around the declarations

--- Comment #69 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 13:42 --- *** Bug 24272 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

Re: INSTALLING gcc (and ZOPE) on DEBIAN

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > I want to install ZOPE server on my debian OP. Since the CMS that I want to > use requires the ZOPE VERSION 2.7.5 I cannot use the "apt-get install Zope" - > method because it is always version 2.6 installed. > That is why I think that I will have to install ZOP

Processed: bug 332683 is forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23711 ..., tagging 332683

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 > forwarded 332683 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23711 Bug#332683: gcc-snapshot - fails to build Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23711. > retitle 332683

nature of GOT bugs (was Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

Thanks *very much* for your help explaining this mess. Thiemo Seufer wrote: > - A too large object file can overflow plain GOT. This is not only > MIPS-specific, it affects several architecture's toolchains, Right, it would affect any architecture which does silly things like having a 16-bi

Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 05:39:26PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > We have for MIPS: > > - The plain GOT mode, where a GOT has a maximum size of 2^16 byte, > with 16k symbols. > > - The XGOT mode, with unlimited (2^32 byte) size, which increases > code size by 15-20%, and reduces perfom

Processing of gcc-snapshot_20051008-1_i386.changes

gcc-snapshot_20051008-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-snapshot_20051008-1.dsc gcc-snapshot_20051008.orig.tar.gz gcc-snapshot_20051008-1.diff.gz gcc-snapshot_20051008-1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

gcc-snapshot_20051008-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Rejected: gcc-snapshot_20051008-1_i386.deb: has 3358 file(s) with a time stamp too far into the future (e.g. usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/include/c++/4.1.0/gnu/java/io/PlatformHelper.h [Sat Oct 8 22:28:42 2005]). === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requ

Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: [snip] > > - MultiGOT works fine, until the limit of 16k _dynamic_ symbols is > > hit. A executable/library with larger exported GOT will build > > without warning but will cause ld.so to segfault. This is the main > > bug, and hard to debug (a statically buil

Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 09:11:05PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > [snip] > > > - MultiGOT works fine, until the limit of 16k _dynamic_ symbols is > > > hit. A executable/library with larger exported GOT will build > > > without warning but will cause ld.so to seg

Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 03:18:23PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > What I keep hearing is that no one has reported the bug(s), and nobody except > Thiemo Seufer has even described it/them adequately. This is a bug or bugs > which is not documented in the documentation or bug databases for glibc

Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > It's a lot of work to fix and no one has done it. That's not the same > thing at all. That's nice, but there's still a real problem unrelated to that. An example of a relatively healthy bug which is "a lot of work to fix and no one has done it" is http://gcc.gnu.org/b

Re: nature of GOT bugs (was Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Thanks *very much* for your help explaining this mess. > > Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > - A too large object file can overflow plain GOT. This is not only > > MIPS-specific, it affects several architecture's toolchains, > Right, it would affect any architecture which do

latest version of gcc?

Dear All, Which is the latest version of gcc available to debian via apt-get? The gcc.gnu.org site indicates that the latest gcc is 4.0.2 whereas if I apt-get install gcc I get that 3.3.5 is the latest version. I'm not actually hung up about having the latest version. I'm trying to learn h

[Bug preprocessor/24202] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Segfault with #pragma once

--- Comment #7 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 22:10 --- A regression test identified this patch from Neil on 2003-08-02 as thene start of failures: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2003-08/msg00093.html -- janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Remo

[Bug preprocessor/24202] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Segfault with #pragma once

--- Comment #8 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 22:11 --- Hmm, "regression test" in the last comment should have been "regression hunt". -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24202 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or ar

Results for 4.0.2 (Debian 4.0.2-2) testsuite on m68k-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Sat Oct 1 13:51:09 UTC 2005 Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C execution test FAIL: g++.dg/eh/omit-frame-pointer2.C execution test FAIL: g++.dg/eh/registers1.C execution test FAIL: g++.