David Nusinow writes:
> Package: gcc-4.0
> Version: 4.0.1-2
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> GCC bug http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22278 causes problems
> for the X.Org X server. We currently have a work around in place for the
> most noticeable issues, but code potentially dis
GOTO Masanori writes:
> At Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:11:05 +0900,
> GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > The current gcc-4.0 can't compile the experimental glibc 2.3.5-2 with
> > unstable gcc-4.0 (4.0.1-2) on m68k, due to gcc-4.0's Internal Compiler
> > Error. Note that this problem was not occured with gcc-3.4 (3.
Package: g++-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-2
Severity: important
jigdo is failing to build with g++-4.0 on m68k with the following error:
g++ $cxx -c util/rsyncsum.cc -o util/rsyncsum.o
/usr/lib/gcc/m68k-linux-gnu/4.0.1/../../../../include/c++/4.0.1/bits/stl_bvector.h:
In member function 'std::_Bit_type*
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #319087 to gcc-gnats as PR 22585
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22585
> forwarded 319087 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22585
Bug#319087: internal compiler errors with -O and -mno-ieee-fp/-ffast-math while
building xaos
Noted your statement t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #318534 to gcc-gnats as PR 22507
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22507
> forwarded 318534 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22507
Bug#318534: GCJ segfaults building Apache Cocoon
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #318488 to gcc-gnats as PR 22132
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22132
> forwarded 318488 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22132
Bug#318488: [PR 22132] upcasting a const class pointer to struct the class
derives from generates wrong code
Noted y
Your message dated Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:08:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315033: dependency: libstdc++6-4.0-doc conflicts with
libstdc++5*-doc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #307207 to gcc-gnats as PR 22587
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22587
> forwarded 307207 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22587
Bug#307207: g++-4.0 - shared libraries built with -fvisibility=hidden likes to
segfault
Noted your statement that Bu
Your message dated Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:44:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317318: gcc-4.0: objects compiled with -march=pentium4
unlinkable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:47:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316759: Please add support for GNU/kFreeBSD
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21
16:17 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19664 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21
16:17 ---
*** Bug 22587 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
Package: libgcj5-common
Version: 3.4.4-5
Severity: normal
libgcj5-common creates a symlink from /usr/share/doc/libgcj5-common to
/usr/share/doc/gcc-3.4-base, but does not depend on any packages which
create /usr/share/doc/gcc-3.4-base, in violation of Debian policy,
section 12.3
-- System Informa
Your message dated Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:57:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319293: bug in Package: gfortran
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #319309 to gcc-gnats as PR 22595
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22595
> forwarded 319309 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22595
Bug#319309: g++-4.0 regression
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22595.
> ret
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21
17:05 ---
Confirmed (at least the ICE in redirect_branch_edge and extract_insn,
I cannot reproduce the one in expand_simple_unop).
Reduced testcase:
=
struct A
{
long double d;
};
int foo
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21
17:10 ---
This was already decided against being fixed for 4.0.x series.
--
What|Removed |Added
Your message dated Thu, 21 Jul 2005 19:15:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#284793: libc6-prof: Running programs compiled with
-profile fails
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
GCC host triplet|i486-linux
At Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:33:22 +0200,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> GOTO Masanori writes:
> > At Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:11:05 +0900,
> > GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > The current gcc-4.0 can't compile the experimental glibc 2.3.5-2 with
> > > unstable gcc-4.0 (4.0.1-2) on m68k, due to gcc-4.0's Internal Compiler
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-07-22 05:46
---
I was trying to trigger the "unrecognizable insn" bug with gcc-4.1, because
this bug should be fixed by the patch in PR22576.
I have tested:
gcc -O2 -mno-ieee-fp fractal.c
gcc -O2 -ffast-math fractal.c
gcc -O2 fr
21 matches
Mail list logo
