Fixed in upload of gcc-4.0 4.0ds4-0pre5 to experimental

2005-01-26 Thread Matthias Klose
tag 290950 + fixed-in-experimental tag 291075 + fixed-in-experimental tag 291077 + fixed-in-experimental quit This message was generated automatically in response to an upload to the experimental distribution. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7

Processing of gcc-4.0_4.0ds4-0pre5_i386.changes

2005-01-26 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-4.0_4.0ds4-0pre5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.0_4.0ds4-0pre5.dsc gcc-4.0_4.0ds4.orig.tar.gz gcc-4.0_4.0ds4-0pre5.diff.gz cpp-4.0-doc_4.0-0pre5_all.deb libgcj6-common_4.0-0pre5_all.deb libgcj-common_4.0-0pre5_all.deb libstdc++6-4.0-doc

Processed: Fixed in upload of gcc-4.0 4.0ds4-0pre5 to experimental

2005-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 290950 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#290950: libgcj6-dev: missing conflict Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > tag 291075 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#291075: gij-4.0: /usr/bin/gij-wrapper-4.0 point to gij-3.4 There were no tag

gcc-4.0 override disparity

2005-01-26 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): fastjar_4.0-0pre5_i386.deb: package says priority is optional, override says extra. lib64stdc++6_4.0-0pre5_i386.deb: package says section is base, override says libs. libstdc++6_4.0-0pre5

Bug#291077: marked as done (gij-4.0: reopen bug #287644 libgij.so.0 still not found)

2005-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:13:34 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in upload of gcc-4.0 4.0ds4-0pre5 to experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#290950: marked as done (libgcj6-dev: missing conflict)

2005-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:13:34 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in upload of gcc-4.0 4.0ds4-0pre5 to experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

gcc-4.0_4.0ds4-0pre5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-01-26 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-4.0-doc_4.0-0pre5_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0-doc_4.0-0pre5_all.deb cpp-4.0_4.0-0pre5_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0-0pre5_i386.deb fastjar_4.0-0pre5_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0-0pre5_i386.deb fixincludes_4.0-0pre5_i386.deb to pool/main

Bug#291075: marked as done (gij-4.0: /usr/bin/gij-wrapper-4.0 point to gij-3.4)

2005-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:13:34 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in upload of gcc-4.0 4.0ds4-0pre5 to experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Re: The barman sat motionless

2005-01-26 Thread Rosario Dahl
Subject: agreement for 4223 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 07:53:11 -0400 I reviewed your data and your motrgage percent is very high, therefore you are currently overpaying up to thousands annually. Based on your info, we can a pprove you at 3.6 without any paperwork. Please start here today: http:

Bug#173513: [Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

2005-01-26 Thread cesarb at nitnet dot com dot br
-- What|Removed |Added CC||cesarb at nitnet dot com dot ||br http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s

Bug#261893: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6.6-1-generic: Kernel bug at mm/slab.c:1530)

2005-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:39:54 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#261893: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha 2.6.8-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Results for 3.4.4 20041218 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-7) testsuite on m68k-linux

2005-01-26 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Dec 18 22:04:21 UTC 2004 Native configuration is m68k-linux (a4000t) === gpc tests === Running target any FAIL: emil24.pas FAIL: fjf328.pas FAIL: fjf347.pas FAIL: kurzw2.pas === gpc Summary === # of tests3953 # of expected pass

[Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Using -O2 cannot detect missing return statement in a function

2005-01-26 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-27 01:58 --- I am uninterested in fixing this for 3.4. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|rth at gcc d