[Bug bootstrap/12371] [3.4/3.5 regression] [m68k-linux] bootstrap error in make compare

2004-03-14 Thread doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2004-03-14 09:07 --- Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 regression] [m68k-linux] bootstrap error in make compare pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes: > > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-10 > 05

Processing of gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds5-3_i386.changes

2004-03-14 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds5-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds5-3.dsc gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds5-3.diff.gz cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.3-3_all.deb libgcj-common_3.3.3-3_all.deb libstdc++5-3.3-doc_3.3.3-3_all.deb g77-3.3-doc_3.3.3-3_all.deb gnat-3.3-doc_3.3.3-3_all.

gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds5-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-03-14 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.3-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.3-3_all.deb cpp-3.3_3.3.3-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.3-3_i386.deb fastjar_3.3.3-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fastjar_3.3.3-3_i386.deb fixincludes_3.3.3-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fix

Bug#229567: marked as done ([PR 13877] [3.3 regression] miscompilation with -O -funroll-loops on powerpc)

2004-03-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Mar 2004 07:47:12 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#229567: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.3ds5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#236547: marked as done (gcj-3.3: lost dependency on libgcj4-dev)

2004-03-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
elang-3.3 - The GNU Treelang compiler Closes: 203835 229567 236547 Changes: gcc-3.3 (1:3.3.3ds5-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Update to gcc-3_3-branch CVS 20040314. - Fixes miscompilation with -O -funroll-loops on powerpc (closes: #229567). - Fix ICE in dwarf-2 on code using altive

Bug#237968: InoculateIT needs libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2

2004-03-14 Thread Florian Effenberger
Package: libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 Version: 2.95.4-20 My virus scanner - InoculateIT from CAI - needs libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 which was included with a Debian 3.0 package. In 3.1, I only get libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3. I have to do ln -s /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.

Processing of gcc-snapshot_20040314-1_i386.changes

2004-03-14 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-snapshot_20040314-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-snapshot_20040314-1.dsc gcc-snapshot_20040314.orig.tar.gz gcc-snapshot_20040314-1.diff.gz gcc-snapshot_20040314-1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

gcc-snapshot_20040314-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-03-14 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: gcc-snapshot_20040314-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20040314-1.diff.gz gcc-snapshot_20040314-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20040314-1.dsc gcc-snapshot_20040314-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20040314-1_i386.deb gcc-snapshot

Bug#233548: marked as done ([PR 14203] ICE: in make_decl_rtl)

2004-03-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:33:10 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#233548: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20040314-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#238033: gcj-3.3: libgcj.spec not found

2004-03-14 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Package: gcj-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.3-2 Severity: critical gcj-3.3.3-2 $ gcj --main=org.debian.java.HelloNative -d dist src/org/debian/java/HelloNative.java gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory It seems it's a Debian specific bug -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable A

Bug#238033: marked as done (gcj-3.3: libgcj.spec not found)

2004-03-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:18:12 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#238033: gcj-3.3: libgcj.spec not found has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#238033: gcj-3.3: libgcj.spec not found

2004-03-14 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > gcj -2 was missing a dependency on libgcj4-dev. -3 recommends > libgcj4-dev (you don't need libgcj4-dev for byte-compilation). I installed libgcj4-dev and it works like a charme, thanks for your work! Cheers, -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `-

Results for 3.3.3 (Debian 20040314) testsuite on alpha-unknown-linux-gnu

2004-03-14 Thread Matthias Klose
est === g++ Summary === # of expected passes8195 # of unexpected successes 1 # of expected failures 93 # of untested testcases 22 # of unsupported tests 29 /build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.3ds5/build/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.3.3 (Debian 20040

Results for 3.3.3 (Debian 20040314) testsuite on i486-pc-linux-gnu

2004-03-14 Thread Matthias Klose
# of untested testcases 9 # of unsupported tests 15 /home/packages/gcc/3.3/gcc-3.3-3.3.3ds5/build/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.3.3 (Debian 20040314) === g77 tests === Running target unix === g77 Summary === # of expected passes

Results for 3.3.3 (Debian 20040314) testsuite on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu

2004-03-14 Thread Matthias Klose
93 # of untested testcases 23 # of unsupported tests 28 /build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.3ds5/build/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.3.3 (Debian 20040314) === g77 tests === Running target unix === g77 Summary === # of expected passes1720

f allegiant

2004-03-14 Thread Ashley Hamlin
  The Onl*ine Super Sav`ings Pha'rmacy Vic-odin - Xa}nax - Vi^agra - C(ialis - Lev|itra Save Money (upto 7O%) Sa}ve Time (Overnight Shipping) No Doc:tors Appointment Needed No Presc.ription Required Do]ctor & FDA