Bug#216234: g++-3.3: template function triggers syntax error

2003-10-21 Thread Thimo Neubauer
Hi, Am 19.10.2003 um 23:52 schrieb Falk Hueffner: > The Compaq compiler also rejects it. I'm pretty sure it's the expected > behaviour, but somebody else should check. In my copy of Stroustrups book (german version, 4th edition) there's a short passage in Appendix A.9 talking about parsing of tem

Bug#216849: relocation overflow error

2003-10-21 Thread Thomas Nemeth
Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 3.3.2-0pre5 Severity: critical Hi ! I upgraded gcc yesterday : julie[gacc] cat /root/apt-200310201058.log | grep gcc Inst libgcc1 [1:3.3.2-0pre4] (1:3.3.2-0pre5 Debian:testing) Inst gcc-3.3-base [1:3.3.2-0pre4] (1:3.3.2-0pre5 Debian:testing) Inst gcc-3.3

Bug#216234: g++-3.3: template function triggers syntax error

2003-10-21 Thread Thimo Neubauer
Hi, yet more info for this bug: it may be related to #185604 (also reported by me :) but isn't the same. First of all, the program from #185604 compiles fine with gcc 3.3.2 (no wonder as it went into the regression tests) and the error is different. In the old bug the compiler parsed the specializ

[Bug ada/12450] [3.3/3.4 Regression] Constraint error for valid input

2003-10-21 Thread charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12450 charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/10110] [3.3/3.4 regression] [mipsel-linux]ada bootstrap error

2003-10-21 Thread charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10110 charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/12450] [3.3/3.4 Regression] Constraint error for valid input

2003-10-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12450 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target

[Bug target/10110] [3.3/3.4 regression] [mipsel-linux]ada bootstrap error

2003-10-21 Thread schwab at suse dot de
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10110 --- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2003-10-21 15:58 --- The other error _is_ ada specific, which is trying to use BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT outside the compiler.

[Bug target/10110] [3.3/3.4 regression] [mipsel-linux]ada bootstrap error

2003-10-21 Thread schwab at suse dot de
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10110 --- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2003-10-21 16:02 --- Created an attachment (id=4973) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4973&action=view

[Bug target/10110] [3.3/3.4 regression] [mipsel-linux]ada bootstrap error

2003-10-21 Thread charlet at act-europe dot fr
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10110 --- Additional Comments From charlet at act-europe dot fr 2003-10-21 16:18 --- Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 regression] [mipsel-linux]ada bootstrap error > The other error _is_

Bug#194345: FTB the lufs package

2003-10-21 Thread Eduard Bloch
severity 194345 grave tag 194345 + sid thanks It became worse. The last version cannot build my lufs package because of the astronomical memory usage. Even 2GB of virtual memory isn't enough. MfG, Eduard. -- Letzte Worte eines Turmspringers: "Heute ist das Wasser aber klar!"

Processed: FTB the lufs package

2003-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 194345 grave Bug#194345: g++ 3.3 needs to much memory / gets killed by OOM-killer Bug#194513: Internal error: unbalanced parenthesis in operand 1 Severity set to `grave'. > tag 194345 + sid Bug#194345: g++ 3.3 needs to much memory / gets kille

[Bug ada/10110] [3.3/3.4 regression] [mipsel-linux]ada bootstrap error

2003-10-21 Thread zack at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10110 zack at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Co

[Bug ada/10110] [3.3/3.4 regression] [mipsel-linux]ada bootstrap error

2003-10-21 Thread zack at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10110 zack at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Ass

Bug#216849: [sparc] Re: Bug#216849: relocation overflow error

2003-10-21 Thread Matthias Klose
[CC to Ben] Thomas, please could you recheck with gcc-3.3.2-1 from unstable? Thomas Nemeth writes: > Package: gcc-3.3 > Version: 3.3.2-0pre5 > Severity: critical > > Hi ! > > I upgraded gcc yesterday : > > julie[gacc] cat /root/apt-200310201058.log | grep gcc > Inst libgcc1 [1:3.3.

Bug#194345: FTB the lufs package

2003-10-21 Thread Matthias Klose
Eduard Bloch writes: > severity 194345 grave > tag 194345 + sid > thanks > > It became worse. The last version cannot build my lufs package because > of the astronomical memory usage. Even 2GB of virtual memory isn't > enough. it would be nice if you could tell us the file in question, the comman