On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 23:58, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> It is a problem for us to ship binary packages that we cannot build. What
> happens if we needed to do an urgent update on this package (e.g.,
> security)? Or if a user needs to patch and rebuild it?
>From what I recall, fixing libstdc++3 to b
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:34:31PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> gcc-3.3.2 is supposed to be release in early October. Since the last
> snapshot in Debian, at least one wrong-code-gen bug and one regression
> reported to the Debian BTS is fixed upstream (besides 10 other
> regressions).
>
> Altho
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 212248 wishlist
Bug#212248: gcc-3.3: build fail for libobj not including boehm-gc include files
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> tags 212248 - patch
Bug#212248: gcc-3.3: build fail for libobj not including boehm-gc include files
Tags were: patch
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12375
--- Additional Comments From drow at mvista dot com 2003-09-23 12:59
---
Subject: Re: New: [3.3/3.4 regression] cpp inserting a spurious newline
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11793
--- Additional Comments From david at avoncliff dot com 2003-09-23 17:11
---
I get the following similar error on i386 setup as cross compile to i386
I assume it is the s
Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:55:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line AW: Bug#211082: treelang-3.3: treelang frontend not installed.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
gcc-3.3.2 is supposed to be release in early October. Since the last
snapshot in Debian, at least one wrong-code-gen bug and one regression
reported to the Debian BTS is fixed upstream (besides 10 other
regressions).
Although the toolchain packages are frozen, I want to update the
gcc-3.3 packages
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12375
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Sep 8 19:46:09 UTC 2003
Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/empty6.C (test for warnings, line 6)
FAIL: g++.eh/spec3.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.eh/sp
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12375
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12371
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
11 matches
Mail list logo
