Bug#177840: [Bug optimization/9812] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2148

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9812 --- Additional Comments From wilson at tuliptree dot org 2003-06-30 06:30 --- Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2148 I googled the

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #196090 to gcc-gnats as PR 11366

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # submitted Debian report #196090 to gcc-gnats as PR 11366 > # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11366 > forwarded 196090 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11366 Bug#196090: gcc-3.3: miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2 Bug#196554:

Processed: Re: Bug#197674: g++-3.3: ICE in regenerate_decl_from_template

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 197674 [fixed in 3.4] ICE in regenerate_decl_from_template Bug#197674: g++-3.3: ICE in regenerate_decl_from_template Changed Bug title. > tags 197674 + upstream Bug#197674: [fixed in 3.4] ICE in regenerate_decl_from_template There were no tags

Bug#198752: marked as done (gpc-2.1-3.3: internal error compiling a pascal file)

Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2003 11:24:11 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#198752: gpc-2.1-3.3: internal error compiling a pascal file has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #198269 to gcc-gnats as PR 11368

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # submitted Debian report #198269 to gcc-gnats as PR 11368 > # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11368 > forwarded 198269 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11368 Bug#198269: gcc-3.3: -falign-* has no effect on i386 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.g

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #197504 to gcc-gnats as PR 11369

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # submitted Debian report #197504 to gcc-gnats as PR 11369 > # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11369 > forwarded 197504 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11369 Bug#197504: gcc-3.3: too relaxed checking with -Wstrict-prototypes Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded t

Bug#197375: marked as done (gcj dies when parsing java code with high ASCII values in it)

Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2003 12:43:59 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#197375: gcj dies en parsing java code with high ASCII values in it has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #196600 to gcc-gnats as PR 11370

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # submitted Debian report #196600 to gcc-gnats as PR 11370 > # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11370 > forwarded 196600 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11370 Bug#196600: gcc -Wunreachable-code gives false complaints Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #195834 to gcc-gnats as PR 11371

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # submitted Debian report #195834 to gcc-gnats as PR 11371 > # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11371 > forwarded 195834 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11371 Bug#195834: gcc: bogus warning and/or mis-optimization on ia64 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to ht

[Bug optimization/11368] -falign-* has no effect on i386

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11368 pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug optimization/11368] -falign-* has no effect on i386

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11368 pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/11370] [3.3/3.4 Regression] -Wunreachable-code gives false complaints

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11370 pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/11371] bogus warning and/or mis-optimization on ia64

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11371 pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added

xfree86 miscompilation

Built the 4.3 sources found at deb-src http://www.trinity.unimelb.edu.au/~dstone/xfree86/ ./ with gcc-3.3_3.3.1-0pre0 -O2 on i386. I'm unable to reproduce the recent miscompilation (still seeing this with the current soruces from unstable). Seems something is fixed in xfree86 or something isn't tr

Bug#199361: cpp-3.3: cpp0 not installed in /usr/lib/gcc-lib/*/3.3

Package: cpp-3.3 Version: 1:3.3-2 Severity: normal File: /usr/bin/cpp-3.3 cpp0 is not installed in /usr/lib/gcc-lib/*/3.3 this causes problems when you try to compile using the -V flag. i.e. if gcc is symlinked to the 3.0 version, gcc -v 3.3 should run version 3.3, but without cpp0 in the proper

gcc-3.3_3.3.1ds0-0pre0_m68k.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.3_3.3.1-0pre0_m68k.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.1-0pre0_m68k.deb fastjar_3.3.1-0pre0_m68k.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fastjar_3.3.1-0pre0_m68k.deb fixincludes_3.3.1-0pre0_m68k.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fixincludes_3.3.1-0pre0_m68k.deb g++-3.3_3.3.1-0pre0_m68k.deb

Bug#199361: cpp-3.3: cpp0 not installed in /usr/lib/gcc-lib/*/3.3

On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 06:32:25AM -0400, Ariel Shkedi wrote: > Package: cpp-3.3 > Version: 1:3.3-2 > Severity: normal > File: /usr/bin/cpp-3.3 > > cpp0 is not installed in /usr/lib/gcc-lib/*/3.3 this causes problems > when you try to compile using the -V flag. > > i.e. if gcc is symlinked to the

Results for 3.3.1 20030626 (Debian prerelease) testsuite on m68k-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Thu Jun 26 05:24:39 UTC 2003 Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C execution test FAIL: g++.dg/abi/empty6.C (test for warnings, line 6) FAIL: g++.dg/eh/cleanup1.C (test for excess errors)

[Bug optimization/11350] [3.3/3.4 regression] undefined labels with -Os -fPIC

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11350 pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added