[Bug target/11052] [3.3 regression] [arm] noce_process_if_block() can loose REG_INC notes

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11052 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-17 15:58 --- Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] [arm] noce_process_if_block() can loose REG_INC notes Yes, it looks lik

Bug#189365: [Bug target/10700] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg on 64-bit targets

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

Bug#189365: [Bug target/10587] [3.3/3.4 regression] [ia64] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg compiling libquicktime

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10587 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NE

[Bug target/10700] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg on 64-bit targets

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

Bug#67206: [Bug optimization/9363] unused struct literal constants remain

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9363 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unk