There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
gcc-3.2_3.2.3-0pre3_i386.deb: package says priority is optional, override says
standard.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and th
Accepted:
cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.3-0pre3_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.3-0pre3_all.deb
cpp-3.2_3.2.3-0pre3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.3-0pre3_i386.deb
fastjar_3.2.3-0pre3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fastjar_3.2.3-0pre3_i386.deb
fixincludes_3.2.3-0pre3_i386.deb
Your message dated Sat, 01 Mar 2003 02:32:32 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#177016: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds2-0pre3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
AFAIK the transition from 3.2 to 3.3 requires recompilation of C++
code due to the changed exception handling (now DWARF2 based). As
libstdc++ in 3.2 and 3.2 have the same soname, how to handle it?
Currently 3.2 is in unstable only. Would you want to start the
recompilation before 3.2 based binarie
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre2
Severity: minor
gccbug-3.2 has no manpage.
-
Omniflux
Omniflux writes:
> Package: gcc-3.2
> Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre2
> Severity: minor
>
> gccbug-3.2 has no manpage.
would you mind writing one? texinfo format would be preferred. See
gcc/doc/gcj.texi for an example (in the gcc-3.2 source).
Accepted:
cpp-3.2_3.2.3-0pre3_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.3-0pre3_powerpc.deb
fastjar_3.2.3-0pre3_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fastjar_3.2.3-0pre3_powerpc.deb
fixincludes_3.2.3-0pre3_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fixincludes_3.2.3-0pre3_powerpc.deb
g++-3.2_3.2.3
Accepted:
gcc-snapshot_20030301-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20030301-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20030301-1.dsc
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20030301-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20030301-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20030301-1_i386.deb
gcc-snapshot
Kaveh R. Ghazi writes:
> > From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Kaveh R. Ghazi writes:
> > > > From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > > > The Debian GNU/Linux platform should be changed to 3.0 (released last
> > > > summer). This is still glibc-2.2.5 based. Is
Matthias Klose writes:
> AFAIK the transition from 3.2 to 3.3 requires recompilation of C++
> code due to the changed exception handling (now DWARF2 based). As
> libstdc++ in 3.2 and 3.2 have the same soname, how to handle it?
> Currently 3.2 is in unstable only. Would you want to start the
> recom
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Feb 28 18:29:14 UTC 2003
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: StringBuffer_1 execution from source compiled test
FAIL: StringBuffer_1 execution from bytecode->native test
FAIL: StringBuffer_1 -O executi
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Feb 28 18:29:14 UTC 2003
Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.mike/eh33.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.mike/eh33.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.mike/eh50.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.mike/
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes7951
# of unexpected failures2
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures 91
# of untested testcases 9
# of unsupported tests 3
/build/packages/gcc/snap/gcc-snapshot-20030301/build/gcc
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Feb 28 18:29:14 UTC 2003
Native configuration is i386-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes7372
# of unexpected successes 1
# of e
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Feb 28 18:29:14 UTC 2003
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes7343
# of unexpected successes
In reference to a message from Matthias Klose, dated Mar 01:
> Matthias Klose writes:
> > AFAIK the transition from 3.2 to 3.3 requires recompilation of C++
> > code due to the changed exception handling (now DWARF2 based). As
> > libstdc++ in 3.2 and 3.2 have the same soname, how to handle it?
> >
16 matches
Mail list logo