Bug#175799: package description deceptive

2003-01-09 Thread Phil Edwards
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 02:37:14AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > libstdc++3 - The GNU stdc++ library version 3 > libstdc++3-dbg - The GNU stdc++ library version 3 (debugging files) > libstdc++3-dev - The GNU stdc++ library version 3 (development files) > libstdc++3-doc - The GNU stdc++ library v

Re: array wrapper

2003-01-09 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Hans Ginzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Probably it could be useful for others, but don't know where to post > it. This is likely the wrong place. If you want to publish it, you should best release it as a package of its own, or contribute it to some existing library package, such as Boost.

Bug#175809: Strange or incorrect floating point behaviour

2003-01-09 Thread Gerhard Wesp
> The compiler is certainly allowed to compute 2.5*u at compile time. It I'd suggest -ffloat-store should also apply to such compile-time computations to be consistent. Does this sound reasonable? Regards, -Gerhard -- | voice: +43 (0)676 6253725 *** web: http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~gwesp/ | |

Bug#175809: Strange or incorrect floating point behaviour

2003-01-09 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:51:55AM +0100, Gerhard Wesp wrote: > > The compiler is certainly allowed to compute 2.5*u at compile time. It > > I'd suggest -ffloat-store should also apply to such compile-time > computations to be consistent. Does this sound reasonable? Look at the 3.2 documentatio

Bug#176005: Package is empty

2003-01-09 Thread Ivo Timmermans
Package: libstdc++5-dbg Version: 1:3.2.2-0pre3 Severity: grave Tags: sid > dpkg -L libstdc++5-dbg /. /usr /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/lintian /usr/share/lintian/overrides /usr/share/lintian/overrides/libstdc++5-dbg /usr/lib /usr/lib/debug /usr/share/doc/libstdc++5-dbg 1:3.2.1-0pre3 is a

Bug#176064: gcc-3.2: Provide a way to build cpu-specific versions

2003-01-09 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.2-0pre3 Severity: wishlist I've been rebuilding all my packages with Athlon optimization, using a combination of pbuilder and pentium-builder. Unfortunately, because of the way this works, gcc-3.2 isn't compiled with Athlon optimization. It would be nice to have a

gcc-3.2_3.2.2ds4-0pre4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-01-09 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.2-0pre4_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.2-0pre4_all.deb cpp-3.2_3.2.2-0pre4_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.2-0pre4_i386.deb fastjar_3.2.2-0pre4_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fastjar_3.2.2-0pre4_i386.deb fixincludes_3.2.2-0pre4_i386.deb

Bug#176005: marked as done (Package is empty)

2003-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2003 20:03:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#176005: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2ds4-0pre4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#175251: marked as done (gcc-3.2: evil timeout avoidance script doesn't die!)

2003-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2003 20:03:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#175251: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2ds4-0pre4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#175799: marked as done (package description deceptive)

2003-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2003 20:03:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#175799: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2ds4-0pre4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#175144: marked as done (libstdc++5-pic: no version information available (required by specialmap-reader))

2003-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2003 20:03:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#175144: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2ds4-0pre4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#175253: marked as done (gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2-0pre3 should conflict with gcc-3.2-nof < 1:3.2.2-0pre3 or not include /usr/lib/gcc-lib/arch-linux/3.2.2/libgcc_s_nof.so)

2003-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2003 20:03:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#175253: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2ds4-0pre4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#173844: marked as done (gpc-2.1-3.2-doc: conflict between gpc-2.95-doc and gpc-2.1-3.2-doc)

2003-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2003 20:03:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#173844: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2ds4-0pre4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#176081: libgcj.so.3.0.0 has non-PIC static code linked in

2003-01-09 Thread Jack Howarth
Package: libgcj3 Version: 3.2.2-0pre3 On debian ppc sid, the /usr/lib/libgcj.so.3.0.0 shared lib appears to have non-PIC static lib code linked in which is a violation of debian policy. This probably is a upstream (non-debian) problem as I see this on the same lib from Franz Sirl's redhat based gc

unsubscribe

2003-01-09 Thread Everett Coleman II
unsubscribe -- Everett Coleman II http://colemanTECH.tzo.com

Bug#176081: libgcj.so.3.0.0 has non-PIC static code linked in

2003-01-09 Thread Jack Howarth
Typo...the test was... objdump --all-headers /usr/lib/libgcj.so.3.0.0 | grep TEXTREL TEXTREL 0x0 ...of course. Jack