gcc 3.2.1 switchover

2002-11-24 Thread Jack Howarth
I assume that we were waiting on gcc 3.2.1 to arrive for the switchover of sid to to gcc-3.2 to happen. Once all the arches have gcc 3.2.1 release built for them what is the plan for the migration? I haven't seen it mentioned lately. Jack

FYI: GNAT 3.15p has been released

2002-11-24 Thread Jérôme Marant
Hi, This is just a reminder that GNAT 3.15p has been released. I think that it is far more stable that the version from GCC so it would be nice to make it available to Ada coders. I recall that some people were interested in taking it over. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.or

Processed: two part bug

2002-11-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 16 glibc Bug#16: G++ 3.2 breakage on sparc Bug#169497: libstdc++5: g++-3.2 and libstdc++5 are useless on sparc Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.2' to `glibc'. > clone 16 -1 Bug#16: G++ 3.2 breakage on sparc Bug is marked as b

Bug#168888: two part bug

2002-11-24 Thread Ryan Murray
reassign 16 glibc clone 16 -1 reassign -1 gcc-3.2 retitle 16 sparc: libm has long double versions of math fx, but no prototypes retitle -1 libstdc++ configure check broken thanks #16 will continue to be for the glibc problem of the prototypes not being defined, but the functions e

Processed: unmerging 169497, reassign 169497 to g++-3.2, retitle 169497 to libstdc++ configure check broken

2002-11-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > unmerge 169497 Bug#169497: libstdc++5: g++-3.2 and libstdc++5 are useless on sparc Bug#16: sparc: libm has long double versions of math fx, but no prototypes Disconnected #169497 from all other report(s). > reassign 169497 g++-3.2 Bug#169497: libst

Re: FYI: GNAT 3.15p has been released

2002-11-24 Thread Jon Ward
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 08:47:35PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote: > This is just a reminder that GNAT 3.15p has been released. > I think that it is far more stable that the version from > GCC so it would be nice to make it available to Ada coders. > I recall that some people were interested in