Bug#168888: G++ 3.2 breakage on sparc

Package: g++-3.2 Severity: important Version: 3.2.1-0pre5 As James has already posted, the following does not work on sparc: | (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat test.C | #include | | int main (int argc, char **argv) | { | printf("Hello\n"); | return 0; | | } | (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ech

gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds14-14_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: chill-2.95_2.95.4-14_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/chill-2.95_2.95.4-14_i386.deb cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-14_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-14_all.deb cpp-2.95_2.95.4-14_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95_2.95.4-14_i386.deb g++-2.95_2.95.4-14_i386.deb to

Bug#163238: marked as done (Dependency problems with gcc-2.95.4-12 on hurd-i386)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Nov 2002 01:47:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#163238: fixed in gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds14-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#163234: marked as done (gcc-2.95.4-12 won't build on native hurd-i386)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Nov 2002 01:47:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#163234: fixed in gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds14-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#164582: marked as done (error when building crosscompiler)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Nov 2002 01:47:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#164582: fixed in gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds14-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

new libstdc++ failures

Dan, We seem to be suddenly failing 7 additional libstd-c++ tests in last nights gcc-3.2 build. This isn't happening on entropy so I am wondering if we have lost those keymaps essential for the testsuite to pass. If I recall correctly keymaps for French, German and Itailian have to be installed

Re: new libstdc++ failures

On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 09:48:36AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote: > Dan, > We seem to be suddenly failing 7 additional libstd-c++ tests > in last nights gcc-3.2 build. This isn't happening on entropy so > I am wondering if we have lost those keymaps essential for the > testsuite to pass. If I recal

gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds14-13_i386.changes REJECTED

rejected at the request of the maintainer -- James === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. Your rejected files are in incoming/REJECT/. (Some may also be in incoming/ if your .changes file was unparsable.)

Bug#169003: libstdc++2.10 creates incorrect libname, breaks at least apt-get

Package: libstdc++2.10 Version: 2.95.4-14 Severity: critical Hi, I run debian unstable(sid) on a SPARC arch machine. I just did an apt-get update; apt-get upgrade, and it installed the latest libstdxc++2.10, and then apt-get failed to work. Error from apt was: columbia:~# apt-get update apt-

gcc 3.2 breakage?

Is anyone else seeing this? On doing an apt-get dist-upgrade on debian ppc sid tonight I had a bunch of problems with libstd-c++ going missing. It appears that we have stopped using the name /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 and changed it to libstdc++libc6.2-2.so.3 causing a bunch of binaries t

Bug#169024: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 after apt-get upgrade today from unstable included incorrect symlink?

Package: libstdc++3 Version: 1:3.0.4-13 After running a dist-upgrade today from unstable, several programs (including apt-cache, apt-get, and mozilla) would give the following error when attempting to launch them from a console: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: can

bug

Hi. I'll be quick. The problem is with the package: libstdc++-libc6.2-2 In the unstable distribution, when upgrading from 2.95.4-12 to 2.95.4.14 , some the applications that depend on this library do not work any more. For example aptitude. "aptitude: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc+

Bug#168991: libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2: latest unstable upgrade has broken symlink

Package: libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 Version: 1:2.95.4-14 Severity: grave Tags: sid Justification: renders package unusable latest upgrade to libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 version 1:2.95.4-14 breaks the system, as the /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 symlink does not exist, although the /usr/lib/libstdc++lib

Bug#168998: libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2: Upgrading totally hoses system

Package: libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 Version: 1:2.95.4-14 Severity: grave When I upgrade from -7, I get problems like this all over: # python2.2 python2.2: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Even things like apt-ge

Bug#168991: libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2: latest unstable upgrade has broken symlink

workaround: # cd /usr/lib && ln -s libstdc++-3libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 /Cristian

Bug#168991: libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2: latest unstable upgrade has broken symlink

Hi! I too ran into the problem and fixed my system by the following: heaven:/usr/lib# ln -s libstdc++-3libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 Thus, confirming Christian's fix. I've thankfully only lost a few minutes, but please rush out an update package before too many get locked up syst

Processed: reassign

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 169013 gcc-2.95 Bug#169013: base: typo in libstdc++libc6.2-2.so.3 library name breaks dependencies Bug reassigned from package `libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2' to `gcc-2.95'. > reassign 168991 gcc-2.95 Bug#168991: libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2: latest unsta

Re: C++ library broken

On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 06:41:24PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > Alex Romosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> apt-get: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: > >> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory