Bug#138038: g++: old diversion of c++filt?

Kalle Olavi Niemitalo writes: > If you need more information, please ask. yes. how to detect and remove the diversion?

gcc-snapshot_20020907-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: gcc-snapshot_20020907-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20020907-1.diff.gz gcc-snapshot_20020907-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20020907-1.dsc gcc-snapshot_20020907-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20020907-1_i386.deb gcc-snapshot

Bug#157130: marked as done (FTBFS: causes ICE in gcc-2.96 on ia64)

Your message dated Sat, 07 Sep 2002 12:47:22 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#157130: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20020907-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#157130: gcc 2.96 ICE

Maybe this is because gcc 2.96 is not an official release of gcc and instead is a buggy snapshot? What would I be expected to do if one of my packages were to trigger bugs in gcc 2.96? IMHO the IA64 port should stop using a broken compiler instead of filing bugs on packages that expose bugs in it

Bug#160029: gcc-snapshot_20020907-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: g++ errors

Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20020907-1 Severity: important There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of gcc-snapshot_20020907-1 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 1.169 > Build started at 20020907-1830 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package