gcc-defaults_1.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: chill_2.95.4-16_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-16_i386.deb cpp_2.95.4-16_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_2.95.4-16_i386.deb g++_2.95.4-16_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_2.95.4-16_i386.deb g77_2.95.4-16_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g77

Bug#155002: SuperH supports

Hi, In the article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, NIIBE Yutaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In 3.0.4, we have no Fortran because of nasty reload bugs of SuperH, > we have no Java because of lack of runtime support. Those two are > already have been worked done nicely for 3.1. > > Forthcoming 3.2 has ABI

Bug#155002: SuperH supports

In the article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, YAEGASHI Takeshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niibe, could you make patches agaist gcc sources in current gcc-3.1 > package (1:3.1.1ds2-0pre3)? You can leave other trivial deb packaging > tasks to me. Sorry the latest version seems 1:3.1.1ds3-1 now. -- YAEGAS

Re: gcc 3.1.1 borked on voltaire

Well it doesn't look like its binutils so far. I tried building the current gcc-3.1-3.1.1-ds3 source package against current debian sid and my local 2.12.90.0.15 binutils and it fails in the same manner. I am now rebuilding my local gcc-3.1.1 package which is based on the debian rules/patches d

Bug#155002: SuperH supports

YAEGASHI Takeshi writes: > Hi, > > In the article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > NIIBE Yutaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In 3.0.4, we have no Fortran because of nasty reload bugs of SuperH, > > we have no Java because of lack of runtime support. Those two are > > already have been worked done nice

Re: gcc 3.1.1 borked on voltaire

Chris and Matthias, It appears that binutils is definitely not the culprit with gcc-3.1-3.1.1ds3-1's failure on debian ppc sid. I see the same failure with the build of gcc-3.1-3.1.1ds3-1 on my machine with a locally built binutils 2.12.90.0.15 installed as we do on voltaire. However, I still am