Compile libstlport 4.5.3 with gcc3.1

Hi .. for OpenOffice.org I need libstlport4.5-4.5.3 compiled with gcc-3.1, because of switching the buildprozess to gcc-3.1 for OpenOffice.org. But it seems, that the std.includes were not found, I got errors like this: g++-3.1 -pthread -fexceptions -I../stlport -W -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-unused

Re: Compile libstlport 4.5.3 with gcc3.1

On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 16:05:08 +0200, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote: > for OpenOffice.org I need libstlport4.5-4.5.3 compiled with gcc-3.1, > because of switching the buildprozess to gcc-3.1 for OpenOffice.org. > > But it seems, that the std.includes were not found, I got errors like > this: > g++-3.1

Processed: working on gcc-2.95 reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 146006 [fixed in gcc-3.0] optimization (-O2) broken on m68k Bug#146006: optimization (-O2) broken on m68k Changed Bug title. > tags 146006 + fixed Bug#146006: [fixed in gcc-3.0] optimization (-O2) broken on m68k Tags added: fixed > thanks Stop

Bug#141900: gcj-3.0: compile breaks using temporary inner class instance

retitle 141900 [fixed in gcj-3.1] compile breaks using temporary inner class instance reassign 141900 gcj-3.0 tags 141900 + fixed thanks Ben Burton writes: > Package: gcj > Version: 2:3.0.4-5 > Severity: normal > > Hi. I'm getting a gcj compile error when calling a member function of a > newly

Processed: Re: Bug#141900: gcj-3.0: compile breaks using temporary inner class instance

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 141900 [fixed in gcj-3.1] compile breaks using temporary inner class > instance Bug#141900: gcj-3.0: compile breaks using temporary inner class instance Changed Bug title. > reassign 141900 gcj-3.0 Bug#141900: [fixed in gcj-3.1] compile breaks

Processed: Re: Bug#141902: gcj-3.0: default constructor for inner class causes broken bytecode

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 141902 [fixed in gcj-3.1] default constructor for inner class causes > broken bytecode Bug#141902: gcj-3.0: default constructor for inner class causes broken bytecode Changed Bug title. > severity 141902 + fixed Unknown command or malformed ar

Bug#141902: gcj-3.0: default constructor for inner class causes broken bytecode

retitle 141902 [fixed in gcj-3.1] default constructor for inner class causes broken bytecode severity 141902 + fixed thanks Ben Burton writes: > Package: gcj-3.0 > Version: 1:3.0.4-6 > Severity: normal > > Hi. I have the following piece of code that compiles correctly but then > gives an error

Bug#143138: incomplete compiler bug report

reassign 143138 kdelibs thanks please submit a complete bug report including the preprocessed source. Even better, please try compiling with g++-3.1 and g++-3.0. Thanks, Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#141899: gcj-3.0: locks up during .java->.class compilation

retitle 141899 [fixed in gcj-3.1] locks up during .java->.class compilation severity 141899 + fixed thanks Ben Burton writes: > Package: gcj-3.0 > Version: 1:3.0.4-6 > Severity: normal > > Hi. I have a java file that causes gcj to lock up when it tries to > compile it to java bytecode. The spec

Processed: Re: Bug#141899: gcj-3.0: locks up during .java->.class compilation

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 141899 [fixed in gcj-3.1] locks up during .java->.class compilation Bug#141899: gcj-3.0: locks up during .java->.class compilation Changed Bug title. > severity 141899 + fixed Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > thanks Stoppin

Processed: Re: Bug#138561: g++: parse errors in nested constructor calls

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 138561 [known upstream] parse errors in nested constructor calls Bug#138561: g++: parse errors in nested constructor calls Changed Bug title. > forwarded 138561 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#138561: [known upstream] parse errors in nested constructor c

Processed: fixed gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 141902 + fixed Bug#141902: [fixed in gcj-3.1] default constructor for inner class causes broken bytecode Tags added: fixed > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administ

Bug#135727: please recheck with gpc-2.95.4-9 (final gpc-2.1 release)

tags 135727 + helpneeded forwarded 135727 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks please recheck with gpc-2.95.4-9 (final gpc-2.1 release) on powerpc (gpc-2.95 version in unstable). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: forwarded gpc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 135730 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#135730: writeln radix control Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > tags 135730 + wontfix Bug#135730: writeln radix control Tags added: wontfix > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#148181: gcc-3.1: missing xmmintrin.h

On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 10:03:10AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Jesse Hall writes: > > Package: gcc-3.1 > > Version: 1:3.1-2 > > Severity: normal > > > > The header file "xmmintrin.h" seems to be missing from the package. It > > was introduced in gcc-3.1, and is needed to use the SSE intrinsic >

Bug#142703: sword 1.5.3-1 will not build on alpha with assembler error with map templates

reassign 142703 sword tags 142703 + helpneeded thanks please recompile with g++-3.1 and/or g++-3.0 and report the results, then reassign back. Daniel Glassey writes: > Package: g++ > > sword 1.5.3-1 will not build on alpha. > > the error is for compiling file src/mgr/swmgr.cpp which includes m

Bug#134315: iostream.h does not like -fPIC

retitle 134315 [fixed in g++-3.1] iostream.h does not like -fPIC tags 134315 + fixed reassign 134315 g++-3.0 thanks Arjen Hommersom writes: > Package: gcc > Version: 3.0.3-1 > > This script: > > #!/bin/sh > > cat > /tmp/test.cc << EOF > #include > > int main(void) > { >

Processed: Re: Bug#134315: iostream.h does not like -fPIC

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 134315 [fixed in g++-3.1] iostream.h does not like -fPIC Bug#134315: iostream.h does not like -fPIC Changed Bug title. > tags 134315 + fixed Bug#134315: [fixed in g++-3.1] iostream.h does not like -fPIC Tags added: fixed > reassign 134315 g++-

Bug#127489: Another g++ Internal Compiler Error with templates

reassign 127489 g++-2.95 retitle 127489 [fixed in g++-3.0] Another g++ Internal Compiler Error with templates tags 127489 + fixed thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Package: g++ > Version: 2:2.95.4-9 > > I'm getting another internal compiler error involving templates, > > testcase.cpp: In

Processed: Re: Bug#127489: Another g++ Internal Compiler Error with templates

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 127489 g++-2.95 Bug#127489: Another g++ Internal Compiler Error with templates Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `g++-2.95'. > retitle 127489 [fixed in g++-3.0] Another g++ Internal Compiler Error with > templates Bug#127489: Another g++ I

Bug#118781: g++: g++: internal compiler error using nested templates

reassign 118781 g++-2.95 retitle 118781 [fixed in g++-3.0] internal compiler error using nested templates tags 118781 + fixed thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Package: g++ > Version: 2:2.95.4-8 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > In trying to compile the following C++ program fragment using the com

Processed: Re: Bug#120828: gcc: gcc produces unusable code when compiling avifile using -mcpu=k6

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 120828 avifile Bug#120828: gcc: gcc produces unusable code when compiling avifile using -mcpu=k6 Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `avifile'. > tags 120828 + helpneeded Unknown tag/s: helpneeded. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unre

Processed: Re: Bug#118781: g++: g++: internal compiler error using nested templates

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 118781 g++-2.95 Bug#118781: g++: g++: internal compiler error using nested templates Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `g++-2.95'. > retitle 118781 [fixed in g++-3.0] internal compiler error using nested > templates Bug#118781: g++: g++: i

Bug#120828: gcc: gcc produces unusable code when compiling avifile using -mcpu=k6

reassign 120828 avifile tags 120828 + helpneeded thanks Please could you retest by compiling with gcc-3.1 (and gcc-3.0)? Please reassign back the report after the tests. Dirk Pritsch writes: > Package: gcc > Version: 2:2.95.4-8 > Severity: normal > > When compiling avifile sources with the optio

Processed: Debian report #85230 (Ace)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 85230 + moreinfo Bug#85230: template related ICE compiling ACE 5.1.8 library Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs d

Bug#133257: gcc: Assembler errors when compiling with -funroll-loops

tags 133257 + unreproducible tags 133257 + moreinfo tags 133257 + helpneeded thanks I am unable to reproduce the ICE. Please: - send the preprocessed source - try to compiler with gcc/g++-3.1 and/or 3.0 peter karlsson writes: > Package: gcc > Version: 2:2.95.4-9 > Severity: normal > > When try

Processed: Re: Bug#133257: gcc: Assembler errors when compiling with -funroll-loops

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 133257 + unreproducible Bug#133257: gcc: Assembler errors when compiling with -funroll-loops Tags added: unreproducible > tags 133257 + moreinfo Bug#133257: gcc: Assembler errors when compiling with -funroll-loops Tags added: moreinfo > tags 1332

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#120828: gcc: gcc produces unusable code when compiling avifile using -mcpu=k6

On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 01:48:09PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > reassign 120828 avifile > Bug#120828: gcc: gcc produces unusable code when compiling avifile using > -mcpu=k6 > Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `avifile'. > > > tag

Processed: Re: Bug#144232: g++-3.0: exception handling doesn't work with -O flags

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 144232 [fixed in g++-3.1] exception handling doesn't work with -O > flags Bug#144232: g++-3.0: exception handling doesn't work with -O flags Changed Bug title. > tags 144232 + fixed Bug#144232: [fixed in g++-3.1] exception handling doesn't wor

Bug#144232: g++-3.0: exception handling doesn't work with -O flags

retitle 144232 [fixed in g++-3.1] exception handling doesn't work with -O flags tags 144232 + fixed thanks I am unable to reproduce this with g++-3.0 and g++-3.1. With g++-2.95 it is reproduceible. (tried the example with -g -O2) Zdenek Kabelac writes: > Package: g++-3.0 > Version: 1:3.0.4-7 > Se

Bug#127939: marked as done (gcc: ICE while compiling 2.2.19 kernel)

Your message dated Mon, 27 May 2002 21:24:37 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#127939: gcc: ICE while compiling 2.2.19 kernel has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#118670: g++: libgcc.a symbols end up exported by shared libraries

retitle 118670 [not a bug/fixed in libgcc1] libgcc.a symbols end up exported by shared libraries tags 118670 + fixed reassign 118670 g++-2.95 thanks Martin v. Loewis writes: > >If this is okay, then libgcc.a might as well be in a libgcc.so, > >and we can link that when linking with gcc in

Bug#111613: acknowledged by developer (no longer reproducible)

retitle 111613 [fixed in gcc-3.1] on hppa get a SEGV when compiling pari with -O3 reassign 111613 gcc-3.0 tags 111613 + fixed thanks Bill Allombert writes: > > From: Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > the example given no longer segfaults on paer.debian.org; i presume an > > upload since

Processed: Re: Bug#111613: acknowledged by developer (no longer reproducible)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 111613 [fixed in gcc-3.1] on hppa get a SEGV when compiling pari with > -O3 Bug#111613: gcc3 on hppa (on paer) get a SEGV when compiling pari with -O3 Changed Bug title. > reassign 111613 gcc-3.0 Bug#111613: [fixed in gcc-3.1] on hppa get a SE

Processed: retitle gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 117563 [known upstream] g++: keyword "export" ignored Bug#117563: g++: keyword "export" ignored Changed Bug title. > forwarded 117563 upstream Bug#117563: [known upstream] g++: keyword "export" ignored Noted your statement that Bug has been for

Processed: status of gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 125649 + fixed Bug#125649: [fixed in 3.1] gij: Better error reporting on class not found Tags added: fixed > reassign 125649 gij-3.0 Bug#125649: [fixed in 3.1] gij: Better error reporting on class not found Bug reassigned from package `gij' to `gi

Processed: fixed in gcc-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 108036 [fixed in gcc-3.1, PR other/3997, alpha] gcc generates ..ng > references for static aliases Bug#108036: [PR other/3997, alpha] gcc generates ..ng references for static aliases Changed Bug title. > tags 108036 + fixed Bug#108036: [fixed

Bug#80468: objc/2824: @protocol forward definitions do not work

Synopsis: @protocol forward definitions do not work State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: doko State-Changed-When: Mon May 27 13:35:35 2002 State-Changed-Why: fixed in the gcc-3.1 release http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=2824 --

Bug#89949: marked as done ([PR optimization/3506]: weird behaviour when incrementing volatile ints)

Your message dated Mon, 27 May 2002 22:42:06 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bug report closed by upstream developer has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: fixed in g++-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 81122 + fixed Bug#81122: [fix 3.1: PR c++/3494] Internal compiler error (with wrong code, though) Tags added: fixed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administr

Processed: fixed in gcc-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 65686 [fixed in gcc-3.1] Internal compiler error (signal 11) Bug#65686: gcc: Internal compiler error (signal 11) Changed Bug title. > tags 65686 + fixed Bug#65686: [fixed in gcc-3.1] Internal compiler error (signal 11) Tags added: fixed > than

Bug#65686: fixed in gcc-3.1

retitle 65686 [fixed in gcc-3.1] Internal compiler error (signal 11) tags 65686 + fixed thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#85908: marked as done ([PR preprocessor/3487] unrecognized token before #include points to wrong source)

Your message dated Mon, 27 May 2002 22:51:57 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Not a bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#2910: oldest gcc report in Debian BTS fixed :-)

retitle 2910 [fixed in gcc-3.1] GCC accepts multi-line strings without \ or " " &c tags 2910 + fixed thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#85535: fixed in gcc-3.1

retitle 85535 [fixed in gcc-3.1, PR optimization/3508]: builtin memcmp() could be optimised tags 85535 + fixed thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: oldest gcc report in Debian BTS fixed :-)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 2910 [fixed in gcc-3.1] GCC accepts multi-line strings without \ or " > " &c Bug#2910: [fixed in mainline (3.1)] GCC accepts multi-line strings without \ or " " &c Changed Bug title. > tags 2910 + fixed Bug#2910: [fixed in gcc-3.1] GCC accept

Processed: fixed in gcc-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 85535 [fixed in gcc-3.1, PR optimization/3508]: builtin memcmp() > could be optimised Bug#85535: [PR optimization/3508]: builtin memcmp() could be optimised Changed Bug title. > tags 85535 + fixed Bug#85535: [fixed in gcc-3.1, PR optimization/

Processed: fixed in gcj-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 94974 [fixed in gcj-3.1, PR java/2959] gcj-3.0 does not know that > interface members are public by default Bug#94974: [PR java/2959] gcj-3.0 does not know that interface members are public by default Changed Bug title. > tags 94974 + fixed B

Processed: fixed in gcc-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 97904 [fixed in gcc-3.1, PR optimization/2963] pointless moving Bug#97904: [PR optimization/2963] pointless moving Changed Bug title. > tags 97904 + fixed Bug#97904: [fixed in gcc-3.1, PR optimization/2963] pointless moving Tags added: fixed >

Processed: fixed on gcc mainline

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 95318 [fixed on 3.2/HEAD: PR optimization/2962] unnecessary cwtl Bug#95318: [PR optimization/2962] unnecessary cwtl Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adm

Processed: fixed in gcc mainline

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 105309 [fixed in 3.2/HEAD: PR optimization/3995] i386 optimisation: > joining tests Bug#105309: [PR optimization/3995] i386 optimisation: joining tests Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assist

Processed: merge forwarded gcc reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 107123 gcc Bug#107123: [PR optimization/3996] Non-optimal code Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.0' to `gcc'. > merge 75773 107123 Bug#75773: [PR optimization/3507]: appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on i386 Bug#107123: [PR optimization/399

Processed: fixed gcc bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 131399 [fixed in gcc-3.1, PR c/5597] Initialization of flexible char > array member sefgaults Bug#131399: [PR c/5597] Initialization of flexible char array member sefgaults Changed Bug title. > tags 131399 + fixed Bug#131399: [fixed in gcc-3.1

Processed: fixed gcc bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 102353 [fixed in gcj-3.1, PR java/3492] -fno-bounds-check in > combination with -W gives strange message Bug#102353: [PR java/3492] -fno-bounds-check in combination with -W gives strange message Changed Bug title. > tags 102353 + fixed Bug#10

Processed: fixed in gcj-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 116128 [fixed in gcj-3.1] FileWriter problems Bug#116128: gcj-3.0: FileWriter problems Changed Bug title. > tags 116128 + fixed Bug#116128: [fixed in gcj-3.1] FileWriter problems Tags added: fixed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please con

Bug#122114: feedback wanted on your Debian report #122114

Please could you recheck with gcc-3.0.4 and gcc-3.1 (in unstable) and send the arguments you pass to reproduce the segfault? which command line do you use for compiling? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: fixed in gcc-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 127890 [alpha, fixed in gcc-3.1] ICE in gen_subprogram_die 9463 Bug#127890: gcc-3.0: ICE in gen_subprogram_die 9463 Changed Bug title. > tags 127890 + fixed Bug#127890: [alpha, fixed in gcc-3.1] ICE in gen_subprogram_die 9463 Tags added: fixed

Processed: fixed in gcj-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 121636 [fixed in gcj-3.1] ObjectInputStream.readObject() calls > constructors Bug#121636: libgcj2: ObjectInputStream.readObject() calls constructors Changed Bug title. > tags 121636 + fixed Bug#121636: [fixed in gcj-3.1] ObjectInputStream.read

Processed: fixed in gcc-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 123687 [fixed in gcc-3.1] internal compiler error Bug#123687: GCC 3.0 internal compiler error Changed Bug title. > tags 123687 + fixed Bug#123687: [fixed in gcc-3.1] internal compiler error Tags added: fixed > thanks Stopping processing here.

Re: Compile libstlport 4.5.3 with gcc3.1

Hi .. On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 04:30:37PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: >On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 16:05:08 +0200, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote: >> for OpenOffice.org I need libstlport4.5-4.5.3 compiled with gcc-3.1, >> because of switching the buildprozess to gcc-3.1 for OpenOffice.org. >> >> But i

Bug#135967: feedback wanted on #135967

please try to compile lapack on arm with g77-3.1 and add the results to the report. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging gcj report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 141899 + fixed Bug#141899: [fixed in gcj-3.1] locks up during .java->.class compilation Tags added: fixed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debia

Bug#144935: feedback wanted for report #144935

Dirk, please recheck with g++-3.1 and attach the results to the report. Thanks, Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#137959: Bug #137959

retitle 137959 [fixed in g77-3.1] blas: FTBFS: test failures on hppa tags 137959 + fixed thanks Philip Blundell writes: > severity 137959 important > thanks > > You wrote: > > > marking serious since this bug is keeping several packages out of > > woody. > > Can you clarify whether this is a ne

Processed: Re: Bug#137959: Bug #137959

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 137959 [fixed in g77-3.1] blas: FTBFS: test failures on hppa Bug#137959: blas: FTBFS: test failures on hppa Changed Bug title. > tags 137959 + fixed Bug#137959: [fixed in g77-3.1] blas: FTBFS: test failures on hppa Tags added: fixed > thanks S

Bug#137017: libstdc++3-dev: Included code for rope segment faults. Runs OK in v2.10

retitle 137017 [fixed in libstdc++4-dev] Included code for rope segment faults tags 137017 + fixed thanks Note that you have to use namespace __gnu_cxx with g++-3.1. Marc Singer writes: > Package: libstdc++3-dev > Version: 1:3.0.4-1 > Severity: important > > The following code will segment faul

Processed: Re: Bug#137017: libstdc++3-dev: Included code for rope segment faults. Runs OK in v2.10

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 137017 [fixed in libstdc++4-dev] Included code for rope segment faults Bug#137017: libstdc++3-dev: Included code for rope segment faults. Runs OK in v2.10 Changed Bug title. > tags 137017 + fixed Bug#137017: [fixed in libstdc++4-dev] Included

Processed: Re: Bug#121639: libgcj2: serialization of java.util.Date is broken

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 121639 [fixed in libgcj3] serialization of java.util.Date is broken Bug#121639: libgcj2: serialization of java.util.Date is broken Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug trac

Re: feedback wanted for report #144935

Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 12:43:21AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Dirk, please recheck with g++-3.1 and attach the results to the > > report. > > Could you ask the porters to look into this? There is no value I can add as > it is not a bug in the package per se. hmm