Title: Creating Packages of the GNU Compiler and the Introspector
Dear Debian Gcc Developers,
I am a happy user of debian, and one of the great things about debian is the packaging system.
One thing that I have been wondering about is how the packages are created for gcc.
The introspecto
Estimada empresa,
Le presentamos el software profesional para el comercio electrónico
i p e r 1
es la solución mejor para abrir una tienda en internet,
es un programa completo, potente y al mismo tiempo simple y fácil en
su utilización y navegacion.
Es Perfecto: para la venta al por menor y a
Estimada empresa,
Le presentamos el software profesional para el comercio electrónico
i p e r 1
es la solución mejor para abrir una tienda en internet,
es un programa completo, potente y al mismo tiempo simple y fácil en
su utilización y navegacion.
Es Perfecto: para la venta al por menor y a
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 06:15:56PM +1100, Dancer Vesperman wrote:
>
> I've got what looks like it might be a bug in ostream/streambuf/endl
> interaction, rendered down to a fairly straightforward form. If it _is_
> a bug, it's obviously an upstream bug. I'm unable to figure out just who
> and how
On top of all the other reasons already mentioned, the memory expansion
code for basic_string<> in 3.0 wasn't as good as it could be (and it
wasn't strictly conforming in some cases). These problems have already
been fixed for 3.1; there are some spiffy benchmarks in the libstdc++
mailing list ar
Phil Edwards writes:
>
> On top of all the other reasons already mentioned, the memory expansion
> code for basic_string<> in 3.0 wasn't as good as it could be (and it
> wasn't strictly conforming in some cases). These problems have already
> been fixed for 3.1; there are some spiffy benchmarks i
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 06:27:20PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Phil Edwards writes:
> >
> > On top of all the other reasons already mentioned, the memory expansion
> > code for basic_string<> in 3.0 wasn't as good as it could be (and it
> > wasn't strictly conforming in some cases). These prob
Estimada
empresa,
Le
presentamos el software profesional para el comercio
electrónico
i
p e r 1
es
la solución mejor para abrir una tienda en
in
Estimada
empresa,
Le
presentamos el software profesional para el comercio
electrónico
i
p e r 1
es
la solución mejor para abrir una tienda en
in
Your message dated Wed, 9 Jan 2002 00:08:45 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Debian crosscompiler packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Phil Edwards writes:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 06:27:20PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > how stable is this compared to 3.0.3? Is the ABI upward compatible, so
> > that it could replace 3.0.3?
>
> Good point. This is something a lot of people get confused by. Including
> me, so get your grains
Hakan Ardo writes:
> The process is documented in /usr/share/doc/toolchain-source/README,
> but should probably be placed where people might look for it. Where
> is that?
Maybe you want to provide an updated README.cross file for
gcc-{2.95,3.0}?
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:51:40AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Phil Edwards writes:
> > The library 3.0.95 snapshot is the 3.1 sources as of a few weeks ago,
> > with the exception-handling bits tweaked to work with GCC 3.0.
>
> assume we want to get 3.0.95 into the Debian woody release, we hav
13 matches
Mail list logo
