Hello!
This is merely an automated notification mail from the ddts 'Debian Description
Translation Server'.
A translator recently uploaded a new version of the description of this
package. The descriptions are included below.
No action is required on your part; unless you want to use your veto r
Hello!
This is merely an automated notification mail from the ddts 'Debian Description
Translation Server'.
A translator recently uploaded a new version of the description of this
package. The descriptions are included below.
No action is required on your part; unless you want to use your veto r
Hello!
This is merely an automated notification mail from the ddts 'Debian Description
Translation Server'.
A translator recently uploaded a new version of the description of this
package. The descriptions are included below.
No action is required on your part; unless you want to use your veto r
Package: libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: oldlibs
Installed-Size: 281
Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: egcs1.1 (1.1.2-4)
Version: 2.91.66-4
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2)
Description: The GNU stdc++ library (old egcs version)
I forgot to add that if I link with just '-lstdc++' and not
'-lstdc++-2-libc6.1-2.9.0' it links fine.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 01:23:57PM -0400, Doug Alcorn wrote:
>
> I forgot to add that if I link with just '-lstdc++' and not
> '-lstdc++-2-libc6.1-2.9.0' it links fine.
Wait a second. You didn't show how you were compiling the individual
objects. What version of g++ were you using for that?
Yo
Hello!
This is merely an automated notification mail from the ddts 'Debian Description
Translation Server'.
A translator recently uploaded a new version of the description of this
package. The descriptions are included below.
No action is required on your part; unless you want to use your veto r
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 01:23:57PM -0400, Doug Alcorn wrote:
> >
> > I forgot to add that if I link with just '-lstdc++' and not
> > '-lstdc++-2-libc6.1-2.9.0' it links fine.
>
> Wait a second. You didn't show how you were compiling the individua
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 02:32:23PM -0400, Doug Alcorn wrote:
> OK, there are three components to deal with here. Two are third party
> libraries that get compiled to .a libraries. Both use C++ and I
> explicitly compile them with g++ v2.95.4. On my previously listed
> link command those would be
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> g++ 2.95.4 compiled code will NOT run if linked against libstdc++
> 2.9. It just won't happen.
That's a bummer.
> > Any tips on what command line to use for doing some libraries static
> > and others dynamic? Does the '-static' flag only affect
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 03:34:20PM -0400, Doug Alcorn wrote:
>
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > g++ 2.95.4 compiled code will NOT run if linked against libstdc++
> > 2.9. It just won't happen.
>
> That's a bummer.
>
> > > Any tips on what command line to use for doing some
Hello!
This is merely an automated notification mail from the ddts 'Debian Description
Translation Server'.
A translator recently uploaded a new version of the description of this
package. The descriptions are included below.
No action is required on your part; unless you want to use your veto r
Hello!
This is merely an automated notification mail from the ddts 'Debian Description
Translation Server'.
A translator recently uploaded a new version of the description of this
package. The descriptions are included below.
No action is required on your part; unless you want to use your veto r
Your message dated Fri, 14 Sep 2001 16:36:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#112237: compiler versions.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
14 matches
Mail list logo
