Re: G++ rejects legal code

2001-08-16 Thread Alexei Khlebnikov
"Martin v. Loewis" wrote: > I think so. I fail to see the bug in your report, though. Your code is > illegal (or, rather, ill-formed - some GNU coding style advises us not > to claim that you are breaking the law by writing the code). > > > template > > struct SGBMb : public SGBb <_TW> > > { > >

Bug#108881: Wrong package version of libstdc++2.10 in testing and/or unstable?

2001-08-16 Thread Arndt Schoenewald
Package: libstdc++2.10 Version: 1:2.95.2-14 We just discovered the fact that the .deb version of this package in woody/testing is 1:2.95.2-14, while both sid/unstable and potato/stable contain 1:2.95.2-13. (Visit e.g. http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=libstdc%2B%

Re: G++ rejects legal code

2001-08-16 Thread Martin v. Loewis
> Why only one data member? Members sy and st are public in the base > class. Initialization in the constructor body works OK. Moreover, > (week argument, but) Visual C++ compiles this OK. This is explained in 12.6.2, [class.base.init]. Paragraph 1 explains the syntax for member initializers ct

Bug#101732: [rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org] Re: optimization/3279: internal error at compiling a c++ source file

2001-08-16 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
Hi, I tested again with ii g++-3.0 3.0.1-0pre010811The GNU C++ compiler. and the bug is fixed. Thanks ! --- Begin Message --- Synopsis: internal error at compiling a c++ source file State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: rodrigc State-Changed-When: Sun Aug 12

Bug#101732: marked as done ([PR optimization/3315] ICE compiling mozilla with -O3)

2001-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 16 Aug 2001 21:46:30 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#101732: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: optimization/3279: internal error at compiling a c++ source file has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#106464: marked as done ([alpha] gcc-2.95 generates bad STABS debugging info on Alpha)

2001-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:13:21 -0400 (EDT) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gcc-2.95 generates bad STABS info on Alpha has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#106466: marked as done ([alpha] gcc-2.95.4.ds4-0.010703 doesn't compile on alpha and other problems)

2001-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:14:34 -0400 (EDT) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line New patch allows compilation on alpha has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is