removal of obsolete gcc packages

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: important please remove the following gcc packages for all architecures in testing and unstable. The package names changed. libgcc300 libobjc300 libstdc3.0 libstdc3.0-dev libstdc3.0-dbg libgcj300 libgcj300-dev

Re: missing build-depends

Philip Blundell writes: > >I think you need to add "libgc5-dev" to the gcc build-depends. > >Without that package installed, the package build fails in objc. > > gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds1-0.010506 has: > > Build-Depends: dejagnu (>= 1.3-19990614), bzip2, binutils (>= > 2.11.90.0.1-1), deb >

Bug#97796: marked as done (gpc 'include file bug')

Your message dated Thu, 24 May 2001 19:30:41 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#97796: gpc 'include file bug' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Processed: Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 97030 normal Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code Severity set to `normal'. > retitle 97030 [fixed in gcc-3.0] wrong code generation Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing

Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code

severity 97030 normal retitle 97030 [fixed in gcc-3.0] wrong code generation thanks severity lowered: - works ok with -O1 - works ok with 3.0 Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS writes: > I tried this with gcc-2_95-branch and gcc-3_0-branch from CVS today. > The latest gcc-2.95 has the same problem, but the

Re: gcc question

Andrew 'ashridah' Pilley writes: > which reminds me. when gcc 3.0 gets released, (which is supposed to be > the 15th of june, surprisingly.) how will debian go about switching to it? > (for x86 at least.) just changing the default compiler, and letting packages > get upgraded as they go? or ar