Bug#93929: chill has description of objective-c

On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 06:26:42AM +0200, Jïrgen A. Erhard wrote: > BTW, there's no chill-3.0 package... is this an oversight or is chill no > longer a part of the GCC? GCC switched over from obstacks to its own garbage collection scheme, and no one was interested enough to change the chill fronte

Re: Bug#93929: chill has description of objective-c

> BTW, there's no chill-3.0 package... is this an oversight or is chill no > longer a part of the GCC? Unless somebody comes forward with patches, the chill compiler won't work in gcc 3. It is still included in the sources, but cannot be built. Regards, Martin

Bug#93278: marked as done (gcc-2.95: gcc segfaults on kernel 2.4.3)

Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2001 21:52:51 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed with gcc-2.95-2.95.4-0.010407 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#93786: marked as done (arm-loop.dpatch)

Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2001 21:57:29 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#93786: arm-loop.dpatch has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#91823: marked as done (binutils will not build on arm)

Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2001 22:14:54 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed with has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility