Bug#369642: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha

2006-05-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 08:39:19AM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > retitle 369642 g++-4.0/alpha: -fvisibility-inlines-hidden segfaults on > > reference to static method > > thanks > > Minimal test case attached, bug title updated accordingly. Build w

Bug#369642: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha

2006-05-30 Thread Falk Hueffner
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > retitle 369642 g++-4.0/alpha: -fvisibility-inlines-hidden segfaults on > reference to static method > thanks > > Minimal test case attached, bug title updated accordingly. Build with g++ > -c -fvisibility-inlines-hidden on alpha to see the fun. Maybe

Bug#369642: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha

2006-05-30 Thread Steve Langasek
retitle 369642 g++-4.0/alpha: -fvisibility-inlines-hidden segfaults on reference to static method thanks Minimal test case attached, bug title updated accordingly. Build with g++ -c -fvisibility-inlines-hidden on alpha to see the fun. Nice workaround for any of g++-4.0, g++-4.1, gcc-snapshot is

Processed: Re: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha

2006-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 369642 g++-4.0/alpha: -fvisibility-inlines-hidden segfaults on > reference to static method Bug#369642: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. D

Processed: Re: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha

2006-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 368883 -1 Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha Bug 368883 cloned as bug 369642. > reassign -1 g++-4.0 Bug#369642: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha Bug reassigned from package `qt4-x11' to `g++-4.0'. > severity -1 important Bug#369642

Re: qt4-x11

2006-04-25 Thread Brian Nelson
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:47:19AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 08:31:07AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: >> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:22:50PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >> > >

Re: qt4-x11

2006-04-25 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:47:19AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 08:31:07AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:22:50PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > qt4-x11 needs to be rebuilt on m68k, anything using it currently will

Re: qt4-x11

2006-04-25 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 08:31:07AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:22:50PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > qt4-x11 needs to be rebuilt on m68k, anything using it currently will > > give errors that libXcursor.la can't be found. > > Anyon

Re: qt4-x11

2006-04-25 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:22:50PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Hi, > > qt4-x11 needs to be rebuilt on m68k, anything using it currently will > give errors that libXcursor.la can't be found. > > Unfortunately, GCC 4.0 currently ICEs on QT4. fwiw kdepim and koffice ICE

qt4-x11

2006-04-25 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Hi, qt4-x11 needs to be rebuilt on m68k, anything using it currently will give errors that libXcursor.la can't be found. Unfortunately, GCC 4.0 currently ICEs on QT4. Anyone know whether GCC 4.1 has the same issues? If not, should we proceed to build QT with GCC 4.1, or is that not advi