Re: provide symbols .hidden in gcc 3.1/3.2 when building glibc for ppc

2002-08-14 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
If possible, I'm going to wait for HJ to spin another release of binutils before uploading anything post-2.12.92.0.15. It shouldn't be long. Once he's made another one, I've got the rest of the bits ready to go, so I can probably do the upload for this within a day. What's our time frame for st

Re: provide symbols .hidden in gcc 3.1/3.2 when building glibc for ppc

2002-08-13 Thread Jack Howarth
To give you fellows a better idea of the symbol issues we are dealing with on powerpc in glibc for the transition to gcc 3.2, consider the differences below... for stock glibc 2.2.5-13 (no libgcc-compat code at all)... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ objdump --dynamic-sym /lib/libc.so.6 | grep __divdi3 [EM

Re: provide symbols .hidden in gcc 3.1/3.2 when building glibc for ppc

2002-08-13 Thread Jack Howarth
Okay, HJ Lu has helped resolve the remaining issues in our transition to building glibc under gcc 3.2. There have been several critical binutils bugs fixed related to this issue that Chris Chimelis will get into the next binutils package. The remaining portion of this is the attached patch from Fra