Please do another gcc-3.0 upload (was: Re: katie change: source versions must be newer than existing versions)

2001-07-28 Thread Matthias Klose
James Troup writes: > James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This had to be done since jenna does removals based on version > > numbers and if someone (say, doko@ ;-) uploaded a source package > > with an older version than previously existed, it would be > > auto-deleted in favour of

Please do another gcc-3.0 upload (was: Re: katie change: source versions must be newer than existing versions)

2001-07-28 Thread James Troup
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This had to be done since jenna does removals based on version > numbers and if someone (say, doko@ ;-) uploaded a source package > with an older version than previously existed, it would be > auto-deleted in favour of the existent older-but-newer-by-versi

katie change: source versions must be newer than existing versions

2001-07-28 Thread James Troup
Moin, FYI katie has been changed to check source versions just like it already does for binary versions, i.e. every source upload must have a newer version than the ones currently in the target suite(s). This had to be done since jenna does removals based on version numbers and if someone (say, d