On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 02:39:15PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes:
> > On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 11:42:03AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > It's a little weird. The package that puts the plugin into firefox dir
> > > (via
> > > symlink) is java-gcj-compat-plugin, but gcjwebp
gcj-4.1 in experimental is not just about gcjwebplugin; it contains a
backport of a classpath-0.92 prerelease and gcj from the current
trunk. it's this upgrade which makes gcj interesting for etch. If we
do want to include, it has to be tested with packages currently
depending on it (packages like
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:16:54PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>
> #267040: remote code execution hole due to lack of Java security manager
>
> This is 'fixed' by:
> - Shows warning before loading an applet (Closes: #267040, #301134)
Not a big deal, #383704 brought my browser down before
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 02:59:28AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 11:42:03AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > Last I knew, it still had
> > > serious security problems.
>
> > Which ones? I can't see anything in the BTS.
>
> I wouldn't know them by bug number; previously
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 02:59:28AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Last I knew, it still had
> > > serious security problems.
>
> > Which ones? I can't see anything in the BTS.
>
> I wouldn't know them by bug number; previously though, the problem was that
> gcjwebplugin didn't have appropria
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 11:42:03AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > Would be very nice to have gcjwebplugin-4.1. We'll have no browser java
> > > support
> > > otherwise.
> > Is gcjwebplugin in a presentable state yet?
> I'm not sure (at the time I wrote this, I hadn't tried it). So far I fou
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:53:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:54:39PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > Any chance gcj >= 4.1.1-11j1 can make it into etch?
>
> gcj-4.1 hasn't been frozen yet, but whether this gets into etch depends on
> when it's uploaded.
I see.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:54:39PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Any chance gcj >= 4.1.1-11j1 can make it into etch?
gcj-4.1 hasn't been frozen yet, but whether this gets into etch depends on
when it's uploaded.
> Would be very nice to have gcjwebplugin-4.1. We'll have no browser java
> suppor
Hi!
Any chance gcj >= 4.1.1-11j1 can make it into etch?
Would be very nice to have gcjwebplugin-4.1. We'll have no browser java support
otherwise.
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for
spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to
9 matches
Mail list logo
