Re: armel/armhf arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concernsj

2018-07-23 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Roger! On 07/23/2018 10:42 AM, Roger Shimizu wrote: > I talked to a few people about keeping armel in buster, during 1st and > 2nd day in debcamp. > Seems the blocker is just the buildd server hardware, and memory size it has. According to my colleague Alex Graf at SUSE, you can definitely bui

Re: armel/armhf arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concernsj

2018-07-23 Thread Roger Shimizu
Dear armel/armhf shakeholders, I talked to a few people about keeping armel in buster, during 1st and 2nd day in debcamp. Seems the blocker is just the buildd server hardware, and memory size it has. On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 7:04 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > Quoting Uwe Kleine-König : >> >> I

Re: armel/armhf arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concernsj

2018-06-29 Thread Jeffrey Townsend
Open Network Linux developed for the Open Compute Project has a vested interest in maintaining support for armel at least. I would be interested in sponsoring or donating rack mountable switches using armel processors. On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 3:04 AM, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Quoting Uwe Klein

armel/armhf arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concernsj

2018-06-29 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Quoting Uwe Kleine-König : If the concerns are mostly about the hardware not being rackable, there is a rackable NAS by Netgear: https://www.netgear.com/business/products/storage/readynas/RN2120.aspx#tab-techspecs This seems to be out of stock and discontinued, unfortunately. Anyway,