Re: Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism

> > 'preferred' by whom? I think that this should be controlled by > > sysadmin. The whole 'alternatives' system for making easy > > for sysadmin to change defaults. Why gcc is exception? > > ld and as are exceptions as well. > > use the system compiler to build libfoo, change the system com

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 112887 gcc Bug#112887: gcc in alternatives? Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.0' to `gcc'. > merge 115353 112887 Bug#112887: gcc in alternatives? Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism Merged 112887 115353. > than

Processed: Re: Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 115353 + wontfix Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism Tags added: wontfix > merge 115353 112887 Bug#112887: gcc in alternatives? Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism Mismatch - only Bugs