Re: Kernel 2.2.19 and gcc 2.95.2

2001-04-23 Thread Matthias Klose
Simon Richter writes: > On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Richard Hirst wrote: > > > > The idea is to see whether m68k can live without gcc 2.7.2, since we seem > > > to be the last platform depending on it and the maintainer wants to drop > > > the package. > > > Oh, sorry - I missed that point. Cert

Re: Kernel 2.2.19 and gcc 2.95.2

2001-04-19 Thread Nick Holgate
> 2.2.19 with current kernel-patch-2.2.19-m68k fails with 2.95.2, so there Can you tell me which version you call current? Have you tried kernel-patch-2.2.19-m68k_2.2.19-3? I thought I had fixed the missing __muldi3 symbol problem. Nick ---

Re: Kernel 2.2.19 and gcc 2.95.2

2001-04-19 Thread Simon Richter
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Richard Hirst wrote: > > The idea is to see whether m68k can live without gcc 2.7.2, since we seem > > to be the last platform depending on it and the maintainer wants to drop > > the package. > Oh, sorry - I missed that point. Certainly I've built and run 2.3.x and > 2.4.x