Re: IRC Release Team Meeting on Mon, Aug 23rd, 20 UTC

2010-08-18 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:29:27AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > Well, for upstream support there is: at the bottom of the page. According > to doko sparc32 code generation is unmaintained upstream, and he doesn't > want to step up to maintain it any longer. Well, that is no less of a problem than

Re: IRC Release Team Meeting on Mon, Aug 23rd, 20 UTC

2010-08-17 Thread Matthias Klose
On 18.08.2010 00:29, Philipp Kern wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:13:44PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:52:34PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: sparc had concerns raised about [its] releasability http://release.debian.org/squeeze/arch_qualify.html indicates the number of po

Re: IRC Release Team Meeting on Mon, Aug 23rd, 20 UTC

2010-08-17 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:29:27AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:13:44PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:52:34PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > > sparc had concerns raised about [its] releasability > > http://release.debian.org/squeeze/arch_qualify

Re: IRC Release Team Meeting on Mon, Aug 23rd, 20 UTC

2010-08-17 Thread Philipp Kern
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:13:44PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:52:34PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > sparc had concerns raised about [its] releasability > http://release.debian.org/squeeze/arch_qualify.html indicates the number of > porters and upstream support is questi