Re: Freeze exceptions for gcc-*

2008-04-26 Thread Andreas Barth
* Ludovic Brenta ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080426 14:28]: > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Same thing about GCC; before making 4.3 the default on some > > architectures I asked single members of the release team if regression > > fixes and bug fixes were allowed after the freeze, which w

Re: Freeze exceptions for gcc-*

2008-04-26 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Same thing about GCC; before making 4.3 the default on some > architectures I asked single members of the release team if regression > fixes and bug fixes were allowed after the freeze, which was not > denied at this time. I don't plan to upload a new G

Freeze exceptions for gcc-* (was: Re: Freeze exception for dpkg 1.14.18)

2008-04-26 Thread Matthias Klose
Raphael Hertzog writes: > On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Luk Claes wrote: > > > Here's what I would like to suggest as acceptable for lenny (and thus > > > 1.14.19): > > > > Freeze guidelines are not really up to discussion and I don't like that > > maintainers of key packages send the signal that they don'