>Okay... I'll look into this again in a couple of weeks... Let's give
>time to the autobuilders...
It's not actually a case of the autobuilders being behind; the current 3.0
package doesn't compile on ARM because of some soft-float related lossage.
I think I fixed the copy of the rules in CVS b
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Philippe Troin writes:
> > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > # workaround exists
> > > severity 90363 normal
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > please could you recheck with the g77-3.0 package from experimental?
> >
> > It does wor
Philippe Troin writes:
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > # workaround exists
> > severity 90363 normal
> > thanks
> >
> > please could you recheck with the g77-3.0 package from experimental?
>
> It does work with g77-3.0 AFAIR (not tested by myself, but reported to
> b
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> # workaround exists
> severity 90363 normal
> thanks
>
> please could you recheck with the g77-3.0 package from experimental?
It does work with g77-3.0 AFAIR (not tested by myself, but reported to
be working...)
When is this going to hit unstable ?
4 matches
Mail list logo
