Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 797109 + wontfix
Bug #797109 [libstdc++6] libstdc++6: please consider bumping shlibs to version
>= 5
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
797109: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
On 27/08/15 21:50, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 27/08/15 21:41, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> please could you name such a package and point out why it is broken?
>
> Sorry, no; that's second-hand information, I don't use KDE (or testing)
> myself.
I think https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2015/08
On 27/08/15 21:41, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 08/27/2015 10:24 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> The libstdc++ transition would be easier to track if its shlibs forced
>> a dependency on libstdc++ (>= 5) even for packages not using any of
>> the new symbols.
>
> I'd like to avoid that.
Is there a reli
On 08/27/2015 10:24 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: libstdc++6
> Version: 5.2.1-15
> Severity: normal
>
> The libstdc++ transition would be easier to track if its shlibs forced
> a dependency on libstdc++ (>= 5) even for packages not using any of
> the new symbols.
I'd like to avoid that.
>
Package: libstdc++6
Version: 5.2.1-15
Severity: normal
The libstdc++ transition would be easier to track if its shlibs forced
a dependency on libstdc++ (>= 5) even for packages not using any of
the new symbols.
In practice I suspect most C++ packages depend on a package that has needed
a transiti
5 matches
Mail list logo
