On 2012-08-04 11:42, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 11:14:15 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> OK, that's not what we want. There shouln't be packages "kept back".
>>
> FWIW that result doesn't seem all that bad to me.
In squeeze2wheezy/main piuparts test I currently see 172 passe
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 11:14:15 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> # apt-get --no-y dist-upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Calculating upgrade... Done
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> gcc-4.7-base gcj-4.7-base
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 677582 gcc-4.4-base 4.4.7-1
Bug #677582 [general] gcc-4.4-base: upgrade problems since removal of gcj-4.4
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'gcc-4.4-base'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #677582 to the same values
severity serious
thanks
Raising the severity to serious as I see now about 60 packages (e.g.
libjboss-*-java) failing the squeeze=>wheezy dist-upgrade test because
of this,
I'm not sure about the correct package to assign this to.
On 2012-06-15 03:10, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> during piuparts di
Package: gcc-4.4-base
Version: 4.4.7-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during piuparts dist-upgrade tests I noticed problems upgrading from
squeeze if gcj-4.4 is installed. gcj-4.4 was recently removed from sid
and testing and there is no clean upgrade
5 matches
Mail list logo
