Re: Bug#635126: Raising severity to 'serious'

2011-11-27 Thread Matthias Klose
On 11/26/2011 06:09 PM, Jurij Smakov wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 02:59:58PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> is the sparc maintainer information now correctly documented? >> http://www.debian.org/ports/sparc/ still shows Ben Collins (not active as a >> Debian GCC sparc porter either), > > I

Re: Bug#635126: Raising severity to 'serious'

2011-11-26 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 02:59:58PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > is the sparc maintainer information now correctly documented? > http://www.debian.org/ports/sparc/ still shows Ben Collins (not active as a > Debian GCC sparc porter either), I don't see Ben's name mentioned anywhere on this page,

Re: Bug#635126: Raising severity to 'serious'

2011-11-26 Thread Matthias Klose
On 11/25/2011 08:01 PM, Jurij Smakov wrote: > severity 635126 serious > thanks > > With my sparc port maintainer hat on, I'm setting severity of this bug > back to serious. is the sparc maintainer information now correctly documented? http://www.debian.org/ports/sparc/ still shows Ben Collins (n

Bug#635126: Raising severity to 'serious'

2011-11-25 Thread Jurij Smakov
severity 635126 serious thanks With my sparc port maintainer hat on, I'm setting severity of this bug back to serious. --ftree-sre is on by default for -O2, so pretty much every sparc binary in the archive is potentially affected by it. The fact that the test code does not do anything exotic to