Bug#624743: cannot reproduce

2011-05-24 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hallo! On Mon, 23 May 2011 23:59:27 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > [exim4 SEGFAULT with fortifying options] > It looks like gcc-4.6 is here erroneously optimizing > __builtin___memmove_chk into a memcpy call! This is not a GCC bug (), but it is a glibc header bug (

Processed: Re: Bug#624743: cannot reproduce

2011-05-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 624743 4.6.0-8 Bug #624743 [gcc-4.6] gcc-4.6 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 miscompiles exim4 Bug Marked as found in versions gcc-4.6/4.6.0-8. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 624743: http://bugs.debian.

Bug#624743: cannot reproduce

2011-05-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
found 624743 4.6.0-8 thanks Hello, hurd-i386 is also hit by the bug. Andreas Metzler, le Fri 06 May 2011 20:16:49 +0200, a écrit : > On 2011-05-05 Kees Cook wrote: > > Hi! Thanks for this report. I can't reproduce this segfault. I tried the > > builds both amd64 and i386, and both build fine wi

Bug#624743: cannot reproduce

2011-05-06 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2011-05-05 Kees Cook wrote: > Hi! Thanks for this report. I can't reproduce this segfault. I tried the > builds both amd64 and i386, and both build fine with 4.6.0-6 for me. Do you > have any minimal reproducers that might show this more specifically? Sadly I cannot reproduce this anymore eith

Bug#624743: cannot reproduce

2011-05-05 Thread Kees Cook
Hi! Thanks for this report. I can't reproduce this segfault. I tried the builds both amd64 and i386, and both build fine with 4.6.0-6 for me. Do you have any minimal reproducers that might show this more specifically? Thanks! -Kees -- Kees Cook@debian