On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:56:37PM -0700, Gordon Haverland wrote:
> I must get better at phrasing things then. There is a lot of
> feedback in the bug report. However, within the bug report there
> are still many questions which are never answered or commented
> upon. As far as feedback goes,
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 12:37, Some have written:
> There seems to be tons of feedback with that bug report.
[ Or similar. ]
I must get better at phrasing things then. There is a lot of
feedback in the bug report. However, within the bug report there
are still many questions which are never
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 07:21:49PM -0700, Gordon Haverland wrote:
> Occasionally I get an email from someone who is reporting back to
> many people, but in general I have gotten NO FEEDBACK on this bug
> report! It apparently wasn't reproducible to the person fielding
> the bug report, but it i
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 07:21:49PM -0700, Gordon Haverland wrote:
> Is the only option to upgrade to a 2.6 kernel?
If you want a quick fix, your options are to upgrade to a 2.6 kernel, or to
install the old version of libstdc++6 from gcc 4.0 and put it on hold until
this bug is fixed in the archiv
Occasionally I get an email from someone who is reporting back to
many people, but in general I have gotten NO FEEDBACK on this bug
report! It apparently wasn't reproducible to the person fielding
the bug report, but it is reproducible here. I asked, what can I
do to send you info to fix this
5 matches
Mail list logo
