On 07.12.2008 03:38, brian m. carlson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 01:56:54AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
please forwarded these upstream, mudflap doesn't see much attention.
Apparently, they're already forwarded. It's just that nobody's doing
anything about them. The mudflap code, as imple
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 01:56:54AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
please forwarded these upstream, mudflap doesn't see much attention.
Apparently, they're already forwarded. It's just that nobody's doing
anything about them. The mudflap code, as implemented, is incorrect.
It's not just incorrec
please forwarded these upstream, mudflap doesn't see much attention.
brian m. carlson schrieb:
> tags 336511 -sid
> clone 336511 -1 -2
> reassign -1 libmudflap0
> reassign -1 lib32mudflap0
> kthxbye
>
> The instrumentation of dlopen(3) remains incorrect. Is there any
> activity on this bug, eith
tags 336511 -sid
clone 336511 -1 -2
reassign -1 libmudflap0
reassign -1 lib32mudflap0
kthxbye
The instrumentation of dlopen(3) remains incorrect. Is there any
activity on this bug, either in Debian or upstream? This bug has been
open over three years with a trivial patch and yet it is still pre
4 matches
Mail list logo
