Matthias Klose wrote:
> ohh, Mr. Bunk's "quality" control strikes again ...
>
> Manoj Srivastava writes:
> > reassign 281464 gcc
> > severity 281464 grave
> > thanks
>
> you are sure this a gcc bug, not a binutils bug? same results with 3.2
> and 3.4.
Guessing from the buildlog: Neither nor. It
ohh, Mr. Bunk's "quality" control strikes again ...
Manoj Srivastava writes:
> reassign 281464 gcc
> severity 281464 grave
> thanks
you are sure this a gcc bug, not a binutils bug? same results with 3.2
and 3.4.
> Hi,
>
> Grave, sine it is causing libselinux to fail to build from
> sourc
reassign 281464 gcc
severity 281464 grave
thanks
Hi,
Grave, sine it is causing libselinux to fail to build from
source on mips and mipsel (build fine on all other arches).
On mips and mipsel, gcc is failing to compile libselinux with
failures like (full og attached):
=
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 281464 gcc
Bug#281464: libselinux doesn't build on mips and mipsel
Bug reassigned from package `libselinux' to `gcc'.
> severity 281464 grave
Bug#281464: libselinux doesn't build on mips and mipsel
Severity set to `
4 matches
Mail list logo